IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-terminology-13: (with COMMENT)

Lucien Avramov <lucienav@google.com> Tue, 20 June 2017 01:16 UTC

Return-Path: <lucienav@google.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BBE127B60 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mgyiQEIsekhR for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22c.google.com (mail-pg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C98E13186B for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id f185so55661790pgc.0 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ba/5yClDbw03z0u+v7MVqVKh1F1MbzBWGkP3F526p9c=; b=F21ptqBvNh0EBgN4/8RBgMIT2yjyUbQAWsSg5D9rWRdODRCW5UThCgtyMvDpkbYlOe d6XHinzR7kOYwt8M58O1y4xperATasj7rWzJt0qdvL6+7Jwd+Sicpxu0RbrAYiOMEXtw odTK0BqqZeJrvjxQHZOWvQGZVyxKAbD/1u+Z8NuCuYYeWWLgqWFwljQO21G+3rT0c6SF 9N1Za2lx6IrWVfgs7OkhHWeJR9pdW9lJGFL70egRMHPgWDwGeMq0CH/5JuM/HazL+tow G+44dveo0Z0je+viYZzvx7rJx705OOW/VlSojP07tptSs9X/9Yiv5omdVxCeGpHHB85C UHPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ba/5yClDbw03z0u+v7MVqVKh1F1MbzBWGkP3F526p9c=; b=iv5vU+Xro4XFKsJ3ojaYkCHz1zToWSZnFBO/hEYkf2CC/GyHZAlnCGaDPELZL0D1eB 8yNG1rh8T4+nR4QPLA5M7o4sC5qlGOxPZlYHfXxgm0CDpo9tSHO2iSH4MMRsEjFkRzZO UyglbJvxt6/Q2FbRxEVJE0J7lwMFtFP2YkYmaTXunQ39gTOzmdhiHnoYddNA99YGnthc gDP6hxNUVRbBW6LAw125sgg1O0laEstLCETCTZ3ewz+yz4BdHrdkZ8Svkp3krYgHOMWo XDgtM64V5qX2aXyDNdHLQzA5bWcdkAvZE2yGq46p5jWYt58hlUDzOeNBLgegTgHgaX2F ZnqA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyPmF+2hQGUxQhK7bqAPJ5vBrpLJ4K/UQQelhdw9ipa2x3+ymTX RvcUe1zDte5Y2t0G68Wgn6LxF4EQBYPO
X-Received: by 10.84.224.199 with SMTP id k7mr2144572pln.207.1497921404550; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:16:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.168.5 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <149790785163.10643.5101366875633212921.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <149790785163.10643.5101366875633212921.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Lucien Avramov <lucienav@google.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:16:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CALTEt=A_KM1oAXLORcYP+vYbrDijpKHsP=XgVExo-Bm8fBxYSQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-terminology@ietf.org, Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>, bmwg-chairs@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f4030436191c3893b905525a01f6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/-yXk8Y_1YPN1BzN-yvgMvp4Rgus>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-terminology-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 01:16:49 -0000

Hi Alvaro,

Thank you for the comment. We (authors and chair) agree all with Mirja and
made an effort to clarify the text in the outline and in the content (the
latest version reflect those changes).

I object to changing the tittle, this is the essence of this testing and
want to keep it as it. Our efforts to clarify the publication content and
tests to perform clarify the ask.

Thanks for the feedback.

Cheers,
Lucien

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com> wrote:

> Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-terminology-13: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-terminology/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I agree with Mirja.  Given that the text (in the Abstract) already
> recognize
> the broader applicability, I would like to see that reflected in a clear
> way on
> the title and the contents.
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email