[bmwg] SDN Controller and IGP Database size
Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net> Tue, 13 June 2017 17:01 UTC
Return-Path: <sbanks@encrypted.net>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1EF11316EF for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z5HdVuUBMTTd for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aws.hosed.org (aws.hosed.org [50.16.104.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D7961316E8 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aws.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977FE803BE; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:01:57 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aws.hosed.org
Received: from aws.hosed.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aws.hosed.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BHfDJWgS6grI; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:01:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [172.31.98.233] (193.sub-166-148-94.myvzw.com [166.148.94.193]) by aws.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E5B180366; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:01:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:01:47 -0700
Message-Id: <503A3A34-6C12-449F-A0A1-DE0134C3E1C6@encrypted.net>
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/10zT-85r4_hxda0R0MK4rwA_ZkI>
Subject: [bmwg] SDN Controller and IGP Database size
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:02:00 -0000
Hello, At our last IETF meeting, I took an action to follow up with the rest of my fellow authors on the SDN Controller draft with a question around IGP database size, and if it was in scope of the draft. We have consensus amongst ourselves (as authors) that this is out of scope; it's an interesting question, related, but orthogonal to the intention of the draft, and therefore out of scope. Please let us know if you have any questions. Kind regards, Sarah