IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-04.txt

Gábor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu> Wed, 13 September 2023 06:31 UTC

Return-Path: <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E89FC151530 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 23:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J0CR_Mb75EEb for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 23:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frogstar.hit.bme.hu (frogstar.hit.bme.hu [IPv6:2001:738:2001:4020::2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 899D2C14CE27 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 23:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.123.8] (szefw.sze.hu [193.224.128.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by frogstar.hit.bme.hu (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 38D6UojW049877 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:30:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lencse@hit.bme.hu)
X-Authentication-Warning: frogstar.hit.bme.hu: Host szefw.sze.hu [193.224.128.20] claimed to be [192.168.123.8]
Message-ID: <5511c42a-ce0e-bfc7-2269-0198ea338e4f@hit.bme.hu>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:30:45 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: bmwg@ietf.org
References: <169458640503.4770.17614829859263027225@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Gábor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
In-Reply-To: <169458640503.4770.17614829859263027225@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at frogstar.hit.bme.hu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Received-SPF: pass (frogstar.hit.bme.hu: authenticated connection) receiver=frogstar.hit.bme.hu; client-ip=193.224.128.20; helo=[192.168.123.8]; envelope-from=lencse@hit.bme.hu; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.11;
X-DCC-sonic-Metrics: frogstar.hit.bme.hu; whitelist
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.86 on 152.66.248.44
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/3pWox3ZsMMj8n5bCbsvCrn7AFc4>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-04.txt
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 06:31:05 -0000

Dear BMWG Chairs and Members,

I have just posted the updated version of our I-D.  There were only some 
minor updates to Section 3.2 and Section 7.

With my co-author, Keiichi Shima, we believe that our draft is ready for 
WGLC.

Best regards,

Gábor


9/13/2023 8:26 AM keltezéssel, internet-drafts@ietf.org írta:
> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-04.txt is now available.
> It is a work item of the Benchmarking Methodology (BMWG) WG of the IETF.
>
>     Title:   Benchmarking Methodology for Stateful NATxy Gateways using RFC 4814 Pseudorandom Port Numbers
>     Authors: Gábor Lencse
>              Keiichi Shima
>     Name:    draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-04.txt
>     Pages:   28
>     Dates:   2023-09-12
>
> Abstract:
>
>     RFC 2544 has defined a benchmarking methodology for network
>     interconnect devices.  RFC 5180 addressed IPv6 specificities and it
>     also provided a technology update, but excluded IPv6 transition
>     technologies.  RFC 8219 addressed IPv6 transition technologies,
>     including stateful NAT64.  However, none of them discussed how to
>     apply RFC 4814 pseudorandom port numbers to any stateful NATxy
>     (NAT44, NAT64, NAT66) technologies.  We discuss why using
>     pseudorandom port numbers with stateful NATxy gateways is a difficult
>     problem.  We recommend a solution limiting the port number ranges and
>     using two test phases (phase 1 and phase 2).  We show how the classic
>     performance measurement procedures (e.g. throughput, frame loss rate,
>     latency, etc.) can be carried out.  We also define new performance
>     metrics and measurement procedures for maximum connection
>     establishment rate, connection tear down rate and connection tracking
>     table capacity measurements.
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful/
>
> There is also an HTMLized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-04
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-04
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email