Re: [bmwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-protection term-06 and meth-05

Eric Brendel <ejb@pektel.com> Fri, 31 July 2009 03:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ejb@pektel.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B2D3A686B for <bmwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3VxzuRl6oFQe for <bmwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail44.atl.registeredsite.com (mail44.atl.registeredsite.com [209.237.134.234]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289D43A6868 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mymail.myregisteredsite.com (wmailnode1i.webmail.web.com [209.237.134.187]) by mail44.atl.registeredsite.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id n6V3jCtP011980 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:45:12 -0400
Received: (qmail 20483 invoked by uid 80); 31 Jul 2009 03:45:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.21?) (ejb@pektel.com@69.142.53.27) by 209.237.134.183 with ESMTPA; 31 Jul 2009 03:45:12 -0000
Message-Id: <7A45B1A1-006D-4B99-A6C6-069EC545133F@pektel.com>
From: Eric Brendel <ejb@pektel.com>
To: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>, bmwg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <200907021825.n62IP0AK007666@alph001.aldc.att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:45:11 -0400
References: <200907021825.n62IP0AK007666@alph001.aldc.att.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Subject: Re: [bmwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-protection term-06 and meth-05
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:45:11 -0000

I have been following these drafts for a few years now and believe  
they are ready to be sent to  the area directors for publication as  
RFCs.


On Jul 2, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Al Morton wrote:

> BMWG,
>
> This message begins a Last call on the Sub-IP Protection terms and  
> methods.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/bmwg/draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term/
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/bmwg/draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-meth/
>
> The Last Call with end on July 31, 2009.
>
> We've been discussing this topic in BMWG almost as long as I
> been chairman.  Two original authors of the terms had to leave
> us, but others stepped-up and have brought this work to a
> good state of completeness.  In fact, I've recently shared our
> terms draft with some colleagues in the MEF who were quite impressed.
>
> Please weigh-in on whether or not these Internet-Drafts
> should be given to the Area Directors and IESG for consideration and
> publication as an Informational RFCs.  Send your comments
> to this list or acmorton@att.com.
>
> Al
> bmwg chair
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg