IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-multihome-evpn-02.txt

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com> Mon, 26 August 2019 11:19 UTC

Return-Path: <acm@research.att.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5E012011A for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 04:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aBwLzDdcnT0U for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 04:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E81A1200C3 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 04:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049287.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049287.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7QBFGIB026398; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 07:19:17 -0400
Received: from tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (sbcsmtp3.sbc.com [144.160.112.28]) by m0049287.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2umcuva4af-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 07:19:16 -0400
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x7QBJFkd064190; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 06:19:16 -0500
Received: from zlp30496.vci.att.com (zlp30496.vci.att.com [135.46.181.157]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x7QBJDsF064123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 06:19:13 -0500
Received: from zlp30496.vci.att.com (zlp30496.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30496.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 06DEC400B57F; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:19:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (unknown [135.41.1.46]) by zlp30496.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id DCDC5400B575; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:19:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sldc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x7QBJCrh019133; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 06:19:12 -0500
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.178.11]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x7QBJ4aM018526; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 06:19:04 -0500
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njbdcas1.research.att.com [135.197.255.61]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90AC4F2BDD; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 07:19:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njmtexg5.research.att.com ([fe80::b09c:ff13:4487:78b6]) by njbdcas1.research.att.com ([fe80::8c6b:4b77:618f:9a01%11]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 07:19:03 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>
To: Sudhin Jacob <sjacob@juniper.net>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
CC: "UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com>
Thread-Topic: draft-morton-bmwg-multihome-evpn-02.txt
Thread-Index: AdVb8h45fimLiJoATfqL5epyKyQLuwADNPYQ
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:19:02 +0000
Message-ID: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CFA0AEB18C@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
References: <MN2PR05MB6208499395F2361D2A40CDBCC2A10@MN2PR05MB6208.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR05MB6208499395F2361D2A40CDBCC2A10@MN2PR05MB6208.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [69.141.203.172]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CFA0AEB18Cnjmtexg5researc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-08-26_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908260126
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/6l_0U52ObkFmspJ9UqBadvgyyng>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-multihome-evpn-02.txt
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:19:20 -0000

Hi Sudhin,

Thanks for your comments. Jim and I will prepare a reply soon.
You can expect some questions in response, such as:

- why do you believe Figure 1 is no longer required?
- what are the specific areas/topics where you want more
   configuration details for the setup(s)?

There are many other activities in-progress during the up-coming
weeks, so we appreciate your patience.

regards,
Al and Jim

From: Sudhin Jacob [mailto:sjacob@juniper.net]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 5:53 AM
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@research.att.com>; UTTARO, JAMES <ju1738@att.com>
Subject: REG: draft-morton-bmwg-multihome-evpn-02.txt

Hi Al/Jim,

I had gone through the below draft. Could you please clarify the following.

1.      I think figure 1 is not required.
2.      Figure 2 is perfect for the test.
3.      Please provide the configuration details of test setup.
4.      Section 5.2. Please take care of the following, keep one as constant. In this flow and frame size as variables. This gives ambiguous results.  Request you to have clarity on flows.  Is it per vlan flows or 100k flows in one vlan.
5.      Request you to keep flow as constant change frame size from 64B to 1500.
6.      It would be good to have a table for section 5.2
7.      Could you please clarify on section 5.5 calculation part.
8.      Could you please re consider section 6 based on point number 4.
9.      Could you please explain the calculation part in section 6.4
10.   Could you please explain the table mentioned in section 7.


Regards,
Sudhin



Juniper Business Use Only

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email