[bmwg] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest

Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net> Tue, 09 March 2021 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <sbanks@encrypted.net>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346013A1015 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 14:39:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mOjhlfi6pj-t for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 14:39:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xyz.hosed.xyz (xyz.hosed.xyz [71.114.67.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8298F3A1014 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 14:39:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xyz.hosed.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4650613C1229 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:39:32 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xyz.hosed.xyz
Received: from xyz.hosed.xyz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xyz.hosed.xyz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0icaKcAg0zZK for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:39:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.0.0.65] (c-73-71-250-98.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.71.250.98]) by xyz.hosed.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA5A813C1102 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:39:31 -0500 (EST)
From: Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_79EFC646-CE12-4AE2-9C27-897E5D63B28B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
Message-Id: <A03CA7D1-6399-4AC2-86A8-1270D2727061@encrypted.net>
References: <161532938049.15895.1821081597744945687@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 14:39:30 -0800
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/83PQ6VNw6vmQMOoENKNXcYYKxE8>
Subject: [bmwg] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 22:39:35 -0000

Hello BMWG,
    As the document shepherd for the EVPN draft, we've seen a decent amount of review and a lot of editing from the authors on this draft. Thank you to Sudhin and coauthors for their due diligence in addressing the reviews and edits that have come in. I'd like to ask the WG to review the draft as we enter a 4th WGLC, to run from today through March 23rd, 2021. Please review the document and share your feedback and/or support for the draft to move to through the RFCE queue and find a home in the Informational RFC archives :) Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can help you along in the process.

Thank you,
Sarah (as Doc She, BMWG co-chair)

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
> Subject: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest
> Date: March 9, 2021 at 2:36:20 PM PST
> To: <bmwg-chairs@ietf.org>rg>, <draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest@ietf.org>rg>, <sbanks@encrypted.net>
> 
> 
> The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest has been changed to "In WG Last
> Call" from "WG Document" by Sarah Banks:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest/
> 
> Comment:
> Sending the document through a 4th and hopefully final WGLC. The document has
> seen extensive editing and reviewing post feedback from Warren.