IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term-02 and meth-02

Marius Georgescu <marius.georgescu@rcs-rds.ro> Tue, 01 November 2016 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <marius.georgescu@rcs-rds.ro>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712AB1298D3 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 07:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=rcs-rds.ro
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QYe6PkaWdo-K for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 07:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailproxy3.rcs-rds.ro (mailproxy3.rcs-rds.ro [212.54.120.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B3A51297B8 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 07:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.252.6.212] (unknown [10.252.6.212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailproxy3.rcs-rds.ro (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBEFF17D4CA for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:35:33 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=rcs-rds.ro; s=MailProxy; t=1478010933; bh=2Ievh3a0FjgLvdlWWzHdVp6mctpHhpHNrD1Ggd5/qAU=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=m9XKw67By8z+f9Wirhz3N1iqoCiBFYIMTWv5jW0knOUXJ6plTjDDDdwH34FQ8sOM3 Ti0MPskts1KABd+Cbgc0a2+lo0Rv5KdE45/KSSKuLg2uuWzcFe8NS+bO1oFEojoNeY LIZNTqmLQyRDe5W1KC4EMeFTMMjYlOeFh2qqH4HI=
To: "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
From: Marius Georgescu <marius.georgescu@rcs-rds.ro>
Message-ID: <3bccc7f4-f887-96cf-90bb-90455419443f@rcs-rds.ro>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 16:38:34 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------1C9A91D3C7C42F65A4D75DFC"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/AGwMpGRhblgVBVTpP-rOrPX0pSc>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term-02 and meth-02
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 14:35:40 -0000

Hello BMWG,

I have read both drafts and generally I find them mature enough to be forwarded to the IESG.  

I also have one comment which seems still uncovered and may improve the
draft further.

#1# Is the average the most representative time in most of the
measurements presented in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-02
?

Would it make sense to have maybe a "Maximum Topology Discovery Time" as
a sort of worst case scenario?
The question can stand as well for other benchmarks.

Best regards,

Marius Georgescu
Backbone Engineer
RCS & RDS Bucharest
http://www.rcs-rds.ro
--
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. 
If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person),
you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such a case, you should destroy this message 
and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email