Re: [bmwg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-07: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 08 June 2017 12:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59BA127342; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 05:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fLk19F2XMEtw; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 05:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8AE61287A7; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 05:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.2.172] (ip-13-230-239-173.toronto.ca.northamericancoax.com [173.239.230.13]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v58Ccetu092485 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 07:38:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host ip-13-230-239-173.toronto.ca.northamericancoax.com [173.239.230.13] claimed to be [10.0.2.172]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-37FDA06A-E216-45F6-BE5F-8FD61993492F
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (14F89)
In-Reply-To: <0E4C7D6C-0727-48F3-8C1B-F42D54C8A1C9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:38:39 -0400
Cc: Alfred C Morton <acmorton@att.com>, bmwg-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, bmwg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <87BB90C5-4E50-4E11-8411-C8CAE4C97F37@nostrum.com>
References: <F5108B2C-9699-45D5-B9D3-53B96778D687@rcs-rds.ro> <0E4C7D6C-0727-48F3-8C1B-F42D54C8A1C9@gmail.com>
To: Marius Georgescu <marius.georgescul@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/BaI0s3cps7_CxOrt2JkbPY-f-Pk>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 12:38:47 -0000


> On Jun 8, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Marius Georgescu <marius.georgescul@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello Ben,
> 
> Thank you for your review.
> Many of the BMWG RFCs I've read use 2119 keywords for the reporting format.
> In our understanding, the reason is that the output report of a tester is supposed to follow the format recommendations. 

Okay. I just wanted to make sure they were used "on purpose".

Thanks!

Ben.

> 
> Best regards,
> Marius
>> On Jun 8, 2017, at 3:14 PM, Marius Georgescu <marius.georgescu@rcs-rds.ro> wrote:
>> 
>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-07: No Objection
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> -7.2, Reporting Format: Is it conventional to use 2119 keywords to describe
>> report formatting? (Or is this paragraph really about content, rather than
>> format?)
>> 
>> (Comment repeats for other "format" related paragraphs.)
>> 
>