Re: [bmwg] FW: IETF BMWG Work Item Proposal for SIP PerformanceBenchmarking
Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Thu, 25 May 2006 12:11 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FjEgE-0007ts-BZ; Thu, 25 May 2006 08:11:06 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FjEZl-0006xp-Rm for bmwg@ietf.org; Thu, 25 May 2006 08:04:25 -0400
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se ([193.180.251.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FjEZa-0003VH-7F for bmwg@ietf.org; Thu, 25 May 2006 08:04:25 -0400
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.123]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 6A1904F0001; Thu, 25 May 2006 14:04:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.174]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 25 May 2006 14:04:11 +0200
Received: from [153.88.16.209] ([153.88.16.209]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 25 May 2006 14:04:10 +0200
Message-ID: <44759D38.8070105@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:04:08 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@lucent.com>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] FW: IETF BMWG Work Item Proposal for SIP PerformanceBenchmarking
References: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F0A8BD52D@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com> <447473A8.2080704@lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <447473A8.2080704@lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 May 2006 12:04:10.0833 (UTC) FILETIME=[551C3410:01C67FF3]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:11:04 -0400
Cc: fluffy@cisco.com, davids@iit.edu, "Moore, Sean (Sean)" <smoore@avaya.com>, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, bmwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, As AVT WG chair I do have some opinions on this topic. Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: >> I am not saying that RTP media plane benchmarking is not useful, but I >> believe that it should be within the scope of a different document. > > I am curious: is there such an existing document? Has there been > any work in avt or mmusic for RTP benchmarking? Would the bench- > mark be specific to a codec? There are at least two performance monitoring frameworks for RTP. The first one is RTCP with additional metrics, see RFC 3550 and RFC 3611. There is also the RMONMIB work, which provides another framework for real-time monitoring of performance. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rmonmib-raqmon-framework-16.txt There is a very difficult problem when trying to benchmark end to end performance of media. The reason is that the performance depends on the users subjective quality impression. Errors affects the subjective quality different, and are also dependent on the consuming individual. Thus the connection between objective measurements and subjective quality is very difficult. A common method to get somewhere is to calibrate a objective measurement method towards subjective assessments. That way one can get decent quality of the objective measurement. However the important factor here is that theses measurements are only valid within the confines of the method used in the test. Thus certain system changes or simply values outside of the correlated values lack meaning. The problem with the media plane is that beyond the network characteristics there is so much implementation dependent behavior that affect quality. It is also very difficult to setup probes in meaningful ways within these implementations that are comparable between implementations. > > It would be nice to gauge some consensus in the WG around whether > the "Media Plane" is inline with the notion of SIP benchmarking > or not. > In my knowledge there there is clearly separate parts which are linked in that the full performance of a VoIP "system" clearly is the sum of the signalling and the media plane behavior. The debate about how to correlate the signalling with the media plane measurements that we have had regarding the RFC 3611 update in AVT WG clearly shows there is important factors to consider here. The bottom line is that it is important to be able to correlate a signalling measurement with the media plane measurements to determine the system performance. Cheers Magnus Westerlund Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVA/A ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 8 4048287 Torshamsgatan 23 | Fax +46 8 7575550 S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list bmwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
- RE: [bmwg] FW: IETF BMWG Work Item Proposal for S… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- RE: [bmwg] FW: IETF BMWG Work Item Proposal for S… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [bmwg] FW: IETF BMWG Work Item Proposal for S… Vijay K. Gurbani
- RE: [bmwg] FW: IETF BMWG Work Item Proposal for S… hcb
- Re: [bmwg] FW: IETF BMWG Work Item Proposal for S… Magnus Westerlund
- RE: [bmwg] FW: IETF BMWG Work Item Proposal for S… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [bmwg] FW: IETF BMWG Work Item Proposal for S… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Fwd: FW: [bmwg] FW: IETF BMWG Work Item Proposal … Craig White