IETF Logo Mail Archive

[bmwg] FW: RFC 6982: Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation Status Section

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Thu, 07 May 2015 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67151AC443 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 May 2015 08:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Rh7jZU2w892 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 May 2015 08:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [204.178.8.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1531ACAD5 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2015 08:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-azure.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.18]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3F1121BF0 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2015 12:03:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njfpsrvexg0.research.att.com [135.207.240.40]) by mail-azure.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEC8E0842 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2015 11:43:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com ([fe80::c5dd:2310:7197:58ea]) by NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com ([fe80::c5dd:2310:7197:58ea%17]) with mapi; Thu, 7 May 2015 11:43:45 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 11:41:44 -0400
Thread-Topic: RFC 6982: Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation Status Section
Thread-Index: AdCI2+PJr6tRUDRnQy+bAvT8riOQEAAAG4Wg
Message-ID: <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D020F956CDA@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
References: <554B86EA.2020306@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <554B86EA.2020306@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D020F956CDANJFPSRVEXG0re_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/J5MD-weAHuF_-chbkzckHb3mUDE>
Subject: [bmwg] FW: RFC 6982: Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation Status Section
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 15:43:50 -0000

BMWG, on "Implementation Status"

This is a question we ask as part of document shepherding,
so you can help everyone by including a brief section in future
drafts.  See below.

thanks,
Al
bmwg co-chair

________________________________
From: WGChairs [wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise [bclaise@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 11:38 AM
To: WG Chairs
Subject: RFC 6982: Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation Status Section

Dear WG chairs,

During the IESG retreat this week, we discussed running code. We would like to bring your attention to this RFC: 6982, "Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation Status Section" (experimental).
You can review section 4 for an explanation of the benefits.
Interestingly, out of the 1918 current drafts, only 32 use that "Implementation Status" section.

Please advertise this capability within your WGs.

If you want to see examples, the 32 drafts are:
draft-barre-mptcp-tfo-01.txt:
draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-02.txt:
draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-01.txt:
draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-rsvp-te-ext-02.txt:
draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-03.txt:
draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-07.txt:
draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query-02.txt:
draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-02.txt:
draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid-00.txt:
draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase-05.txt:
draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-01.txt:
draft-ietf-isis-mrt-00.txt:
draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-03.txt:
draft-ietf-ospf-mrt-00.txt:
draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-02.txt:
draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-04.txt:
draft-ietf-rmcat-nada-00.txt:
draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm-03.txt:
draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture-05.txt:
draft-ietf-tram-stun-origin-05.txt:
draft-kong-eppext-bundling-registration-01.txt:
draft-kouvelas-lisp-rloc-membership-01.txt:
draft-li-isis-mrt-02.txt:
draft-martinsen-tram-discuss-02.txt:
draft-mrw-homenet-rtg-comparison-02.txt:
draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-08.txt:
draft-nottingham-safe-hint-06.txt:
draft-pd-dispatch-msrp-websocket-08.txt:
draft-petithuguenin-tram-stun-pmtud-00.txt:
draft-templin-aerolink-52.txt:
draft-yi-manet-reactive-jitter-04.txt:
draft-zhu-rmcat-nada-06.txt:
Regards, Benoit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email