[bmwg] Revised SIP drafts (-08) posted post WGLC
"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Tue, 08 January 2013 17:10 UTC
Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D7E11E80EE for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:10:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-q15RZ0xyiX for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:10:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B561A11E80D1 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:10:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.11]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r08HAAdJ005786 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 11:10:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id r08HA9I9022385 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 11:10:09 -0600
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.237.229]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id r08HA9iW028925 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 11:10:09 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <50EC5368.9000209@bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 11:12:08 -0600
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.11
Subject: [bmwg] Revised SIP drafts (-08) posted post WGLC
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:10:14 -0000
All: The SIP benchmarking methodology and terminology documents have been updated to include the comments from WGLC. A new revision of these drafts (-08) has been posted to the IETF archives. The changes in the revised version are for clarity and editorial in nature. On behalf of my co-authors, I will like to thank Barry Constantine (WGLC review) and Al Morton (shepherd review) for helping make the drafts better. The -08 version is at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-08 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-08 Thank you, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
- [bmwg] Revised SIP drafts (-08) posted post WGLC Vijay K. Gurbani