RE: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12
"Perser, Jerry" <jerry.perser@spirentcom.com> Thu, 15 May 2003 17:49 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16513 for <bmwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 15 May 2003 13:49:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4FHGCe19784 for bmwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 15 May 2003 13:16:12 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4FHFjB19765; Thu, 15 May 2003 13:15:45 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4FHD9B19667 for <bmwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 15 May 2003 13:13:09 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16383 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 May 2003 13:45:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19GMpC-000164-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Thu, 15 May 2003 13:47:26 -0400
Received: from mail-out-b.spirentcom.com ([199.1.46.14] helo=exch-connector.netcomsystems.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19GMpC-00015m-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Thu, 15 May 2003 13:47:26 -0400
Received: by exch-connector.netcomsystems.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) id <KR6ZVHQA>; Thu, 15 May 2003 10:48:01 -0700
Message-ID: <629E717C12A8694A88FAA6BEF9FFCD441E54E0@brigadoon.spirentcom.com>
From: "Perser, Jerry" <jerry.perser@spirentcom.com>
To: "'bmwg@ietf.org'" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 10:48:01 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Tony, > Just for clarification, I sent a private email to Jerry with > nobody else included in the cc list. This is poor etiquette. You expressed that your concerns regarding dsmterm I-D were not being address, while not expressing this to ALL the authors. David, Sumit, Shodha, and Scott have just as much right to your observation as I do. In fact, they wrote most of the I-D. I'm just the lucky bastard that got his name first. > David Newman did not receive an email from me. I send your "time to reply to my concerns" to ALL the authors of dsmterm I-D. David's opinion is his, not mine. The dsmterm I-D is made up five different individuals. Any observations you make about the dsmterm I-D apply to all of the individuals. My reply to the mcast I-D last call is mine along. David had no knowledge, input, or advise on my reply. David knew of these issues. He was CC on the email I send the authors on 4/22 (you, Michele, and the Chairs were also CCed). If David has any concerns on mcast I-D last call, as an individual, he can post them like I did. > I made a personal observation that was taken out of context. I still do not understand the context. If you have an issue with me, send me a personal message, even call me. Debby has. My phone number is on the I-D. If you have an issue with dsmterm I-D (that are not addressed in dsmterm-06), you MUST include all 5 authors. I can even include you in our next conference call so you can voice your concerns to ALL the authors. Jerry. > See enclosed > message. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony DeLaRosa > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 10:54 AM > To: 'Perser, Jerry' > Subject: RE: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12.txt > > > Interesting that you would reply to the mcast I-D last call > but yet you > haven't taken the time to reply to my concerns regarding your > dsmterm I-D. > > Tony > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Newman [mailto:dnewman@networktest.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 4:54 PM > To: bmwg@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12 > > > > OK, thanks. I ask because 1) Jerry Perser posted comments > earlier today and > 2) later today Jerry got email from someone at Ixia (with me > cc'd) attacking > Jerry for commenting during last call. > > Oh, how I love these inter-vendor squabbling matches... :-( > > dn > > > -----Original Message----- > From: bmwg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:bmwg-admin@ietf.org]On > Behalf Of Deric Lim > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 4:38 PM > To: 'bmwg@ietf.org' > Subject: RE: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12 > > > David, > I am replying to Kevin's email requesting feedback from the > BMWG. I am > recommending that this draft to be moved forward to informational RFC > status. That is what I meant by "in agreement" > > Deric > -----Original Message----- > From: David Newman [mailto:dnewman@networktest.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 4:28 PM > To: Lim, Deric [SC100:380:EXCH] > Subject: RE: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12 > > > > with whom are you in agreement? I don't recall any such > recommendation being > made on the reflector. Was there some private communication I > missed? dn > -----Original Message----- > From: bmwg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:bmwg-admin@ietf.org]On > Behalf Of Deric Lim > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 4:15 PM > To: 'bmwg@ietf.org' > Subject: RE: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12 > > > > > I believe that the mcast I-D is ready for consideration by the Area > Directors. I am in agreement that we should move this forward. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Dubray [mailto:kdubray@juniper.net] > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 3:21 PM > To: bmwg@ietf.org > Subject: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12 > > > BMWG: > A WG Last Call period for the Internet-Draft on "Methodology for IP > Multicast Benchmarking," > <draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12.txt> > will be open from 07 May 2003 through 14 May 2003. > A WG Last Call was last issued on version 10 of this draft. > Version 12 > contains substantive changes since the previous Last Call. > Please weigh in > on whether or not you feel that this Internet-Draft should be > given to the > Area Directors for consideration in progressing the Draft to an > Informational RFC. Send your comments to this list or > kdubray@juniper.net. > > > A URL for the Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12.txt > > > > > _______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > bmwg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg > > > _______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > bmwg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg > _______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > bmwg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg > _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list bmwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
- [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12 Kevin Dubray
- RE: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12 Deric Lim
- RE: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12 Deric Lim
- RE: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12 David Newman
- RE: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12 Perser, Jerry
- RE: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12 Deric Lim
- FW: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12 Tony DeLaRosa
- RE: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12 Perser, Jerry
- RE: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-mcastm-12 David Newman