IETF Logo Mail Archive

[bmwg] Regarding <draft-white-network-benchmark-00.txt>

Kevin Dubray <kdubray@juniper.net> Wed, 11 February 2004 23:17 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08698 for <bmwg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:17:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ar3bI-0008EK-2f; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:17:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ar3b4-0008B1-Tt for bmwg@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:16:46 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08639 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:16:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ar3b2-0002n6-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:16:44 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ar3aA-0002ho-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:15:51 -0500
Received: from colo-dns-ext1.juniper.net ([207.17.137.57]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ar3ZQ-0002V5-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:15:04 -0500
Received: from magenta.juniper.net (magenta.juniper.net [172.17.28.122]) by colo-dns-ext1.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i1BNEGl96692; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:14:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kdubray@juniper.net)
Received: from juniper.net (ssh3.juniper.net [207.17.136.47]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i1BNE9f66410; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:14:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kdubray@juniper.net)
Message-ID: <402AB741.5040701@juniper.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:14:09 -0500
From: Kevin Dubray <kdubray@juniper.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 (CK-SillyDog)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bmwg@ietf.org
CC: Russ White <riw@cisco.com>
References: <400EC26A.1040100@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [bmwg] Regarding <draft-white-network-benchmark-00.txt>
Sender: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

It is the opinion of the chairs that the best course of development for 
this work
is as a Individually Submitted I-D.

If no one objects, we will make that recommendation to the principals on 
18 Feb 04.

We would also recommend that the principals gather input from other 
related WGs, like IPPM.

Al, Kevin


Kevin Dubray wrote:
> Supporters of the BMWG:
> 
> A [long] while back, Russ White approached the BMWG with an individually 
> submitted I-D
> that presented considerations when measuring network convergence:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-white-network-benchmark-00.txt

[snip]

 > Please offer your comments in two dimensions: a) does the topic merit
 > future effort, and b) is the BMWG the best home for this effort
 > (as opposed to another WG or progressing the work as an Individually 
submitted I-D)?


_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email