[bmwg] draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-04.txt
Barry Constantine <Barry.Constantine@jdsu.com> Thu, 07 February 2013 17:44 UTC
Return-Path: <Barry.Constantine@jdsu.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E372F21F84D1 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 09:44:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WQqdnXqGxl2G for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 09:44:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og126.obsmtp.com (exprod7og126.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.206]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AB521F8473 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 09:44:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx6.jdsu.com ([209.36.247.248]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob126.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKURPoCFc3pcHqBBz6Kv0CId5TbEYgUD7r@postini.com; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:44:41 PST
Received: from AMEXHTCA01.ds.jdsu.net (192.168.10.41) by mx6.jdsu.com (192.168.10.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 09:39:23 -0800
Received: from AMEXMB01.ds.jdsu.net ([fe80::9402:2c4c:29f3:a264]) by AMEXHTCA01.ds.jdsu.net ([fe80::def:afde:7a37:2c3b%15]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 09:39:49 -0800
From: Barry Constantine <Barry.Constantine@jdsu.com>
To: "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-04.txt
Thread-Index: Ac4FWWklwL3sQr+rQ9CIEyIDTztrXg==
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:39:48 +0000
Message-ID: <DE2AAE0A8826CF4ABC3A6CCB756356EB0D7198@AMEXMB01.ds.jdsu.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.234.234.5]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DE2AAE0A8826CF4ABC3A6CCB756356EB0D7198AMEXMB01dsjdsunet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [bmwg] draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-04.txt
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:44:48 -0000
Hi Mike and Sarah, I have not looked at this draft in a few versions and really like how you all used Sandvine data for the example application traffic mix. I looked at the Sandvine report before asking this question but could not find the answer; can you explain the Ave Flow Size in the table? For example of the YouTube download listed at 5MB and 13.8% of traffic, does this mean that the average video session size is 5MB of which multitudes of the video sessions comprise the 13.8%? Thank you, Barry Constantine JDSU Communications Test Principal Member Technical Staff 301-325-7069
- [bmwg] draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-04.txt Barry Constantine