IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] REG: draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest-03

Manoj Ramalingam <manoj_ramalingam@live.com> Wed, 09 November 2016 08:22 UTC

Return-Path: <manoj_ramalingam@live.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D341296D0 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 00:22:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LfaMux3kPsfg for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 00:22:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU004-OMC4S16.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s16.hotmail.com [65.55.111.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BF1C1296C1 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 00:22:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from IND01-MA1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.111.135]) by BLU004-OMC4S16.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 00:22:53 -0800
Received: from MA1IND01FT008.eop-IND01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.200.52) by MA1IND01HT014.eop-IND01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.200.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.679.5; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 08:22:50 +0000
Received: from MAXPR01MB0377.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.152.200.52) by MA1IND01FT008.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.200.132) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.707.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 08:22:50 +0000
Received: from MAXPR01MB0377.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.164.150.149]) by MAXPR01MB0377.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.164.150.149]) with mapi id 15.01.0707.006; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 08:22:50 +0000
From: Manoj Ramalingam <manoj_ramalingam@live.com>
To: Sudhin Jacob <sjacob@juniper.net>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: REG: draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest-03
Thread-Index: AdIoi6F4r9V2CzCsT4+ir6VEjfi92QR1pRnc
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 08:22:49 +0000
Message-ID: <MAXPR01MB03779602FC6B4B972E81880E84B90@MAXPR01MB0377.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <BN6PR05MB2963D9E97CE6687E6681E712C2D00@BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR05MB2963D9E97CE6687E6681E712C2D00@BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: juniper.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;juniper.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=live.com;
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:; UpperCasedChecksum:; SizeAsReceived:2518; Count:38
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-tmn: [2cNvkJxEjAcPvqBYs9BV3zd/63i8vRaU]
x-incomingheadercount: 38
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; MA1IND01HT014; 6:sBmbp+ra37g7BRY4V8p8OPqDTS1nroaVl0qiMzYV1WGhvCbSQ6V5CiO8lv2O8+7a6rmrOTxNk3e3M9RQQFSul067Mx1t4CP4+TA9KZ7bMHn+YxbgJZFXubcvKWjbDMuMb4AtXZ/HGNIHLVrJXqRUGzAYvTSb06kiEdWeJvv8XBRGqnvBrTkGwuyumxNKsjI3Yr/jWXgNNiXk4peyOSjn74mGTaVbZyem+KRYNHaSM1KH253y0bfPrh1jNgih40hIcBK15P7Ze8BKa69Ow17HxDgVv1X/cwGB8Hrni0mbO3Mpm8HCgkJjASsuLJKKp71v; 5:tAZPkqDDa8jgQ54N6rwOLscSCYzEDZqcxOG4S3bF4Dty/B9ZHQ3o0gLhSJSsLXt1rd8fNvBSyk+MCPgCsHaXcsVo+ZX5pvrId5K/YLl32KcoTa/7u0LdcQZdvim+TAdef/Xe/fp02rtfaTmNjPBEmV6NY7uu3iQpuoIlxkpleaM=; 24:FsEU80u+M99hszkE95+pLAkd+Sh0hi0AFZ7AhjFOYQt9/VFPgNsT/3cHx8H2ypKrrR3w4NImpbNbPzYlvawlXKl3+lyAhlCKTCvDnuo+Nhc=; 7:+3DG6RVffKFthJ8lt335fXWI3hbQyH6WeAWxzpy/qVFwgMBl+V+ejQTqL8LDtE3esvFBjxjOHHLlDqfr4JLrDejKwKvcJXhz+hk6Rk3G2yZ4bnekbuOpsRPpL71JJBpwUlMEGEjFdPwvTd+F0HSXqYNjSqyr3lf3L16YKnLH79XNSLKpCIIQS8Y8dFe9kyYdyoX2vpKbVMoa5yVMsHm0mAQBH0d2C28vmIOFzUZzvjiIGvF23Sltma0TvDg2xWA63Ilju2hIXi9EpH2kTE1beUtfzvpjpEa/0HEUMbjaAooRfqJwiF1yXVR7D3VyL5VqM9qbByIwupLRuVZp2Qnf5vJNHLCmWpWx3aYuRdKom6E=
x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:MA1IND01HT014; H:MAXPR01MB0377.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 15aa37ff-862a-4ee2-7f42-08d408799805
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:MA1IND01HT014;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:MA1IND01HT014; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:MA1IND01HT014;
x-forefront-prvs: 0121F24F22
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MAXPR01MB03779602FC6B4B972E81880E84B90MAXPR01MB0377INDP_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: live.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Nov 2016 08:22:49.8312 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MA1IND01HT014
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2016 08:22:53.0660 (UTC) FILETIME=[77B321C0:01D23A62]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/VMT6pnI01XXHUvwZt3DXRzFSzmE>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] REG: draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest-03
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 08:22:56 -0000

Hi Sudhin,

I reviewed the draft and it is in good shape. I support this draft for adoption.

Few Suggestions:
 - Consider adding testcases to benchmark Mac-move , Inter-subnet and Multicast IGMP snooping scenarios.

Thanks,
Manoj R


________________________________
From: bmwg <bmwg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Sudhin Jacob <sjacob@juniper.net>
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 9:12 PM
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: [bmwg] REG: draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest-03

Hi All,

Let me thank you for the support and comments. We value your feedback. We have uploaded the latest draft for benchmarking EVPN and PBB-EVPN( combined) based on the comments received so far.


EVPN

It is based on RFC 7432 (BGP based Ethernet VPN).

Since the EVPN is widely deployed in data center and in service provider network, as such there is no benchmarking standard for these services, because of that each vendors interpret it differently.
This creates issues for the end users. This draft is a proposal to alleviate these issues by defining certain benchmarking parameters to evaluate these protocol/services.

Regards,
Sudhin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email