IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] In Service Software Upgrade Draft

"Fernando Calabria (fcalabri)" <fcalabri@cisco.com> Tue, 08 July 2014 12:28 UTC

Return-Path: <fcalabri@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765981B280E for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 05:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5uichPJ-8vvq for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 05:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E04BC1A00FE for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 05:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1985; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1404822498; x=1406032098; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=oVlAo3MyhBdkZbPwPTSCr6c7ElMZLVutVoGj5bPW/ww=; b=Tc/cOXt8sarmMyzOSQAaEFQytnbSF6ut4I2GzS6hNhKodqVEzFCzt5dd /gbvSaht2VdoORDVWYPbljZYRbeyX5WOF2dTaM1qJ9pDO2HNLvyxBZkuU ovUaF+9lfpceDsSOWbQbkT51xDGm2IcoAi5HfFBJAlXAE4yUS7xvyRxwX 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgYFAK3iu1OtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABZgw5SWr53iFwWdYQDAQEBBAEBATc0FwYBCBUhCS4LFBMEARKIQg3JEheTbAWadoFIihaILoNDbIFE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,625,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="59112865"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Jul 2014 12:28:16 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com [173.37.183.79]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s68CSGoL021123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 12:28:16 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.6.216]) by xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com ([173.37.183.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 07:28:16 -0500
From: "Fernando Calabria (fcalabri)" <fcalabri@cisco.com>
To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>, "Banks, Sarah" <sbanks@akamai.com>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bmwg] In Service Software Upgrade Draft
Thread-Index: AQHPmqgX6ARzAuL2skCib8mycbQgtA==
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 12:28:15 +0000
Message-ID: <CFE15AA2.1FE76%fcalabri@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.3.140616
x-originating-ip: [10.117.99.244]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <E96FEBCF0E01AE48B45C56E22325A4BD@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/a4qUq6O19GhEHJQzMBNGVbhE31c
Subject: Re: [bmwg] In Service Software Upgrade Draft
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 12:28:23 -0000

The point we were discussing was the fact that some implementations will
reset the session timers / statistics. While the ISSU process may / should
not affect the control and forwarding plane, in  some implementations the
timers for the session up-time and other statistics   are reset . Should
we address this as part of the Exit criteria for an ISSU process ?


Rgds 


Fernando 



On 7/8/14, 8:16 AM, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Banks, Sarah
>...
>> 	The ISSU draft is in a pretty solid state, from the authors point of
>> view. We wanted to solicit a bit of feedback, and make sure we've
>>covered
>> all bases. There was some discussion around the authors as to adding
>>some
>> text around timers and counters in the draft - do you trust the DUT?
>> Should you confirm these outside of the DUT? Etc. Thoughts?
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Sarah & Fernando & Gery
>> 
>
>I gave this topic some thought last week:
>
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-01#section-4.2
>
>   ... external observations remain essential as the
>   basis for Benchmarks.  Internal observations with fixed specification
>   and interpretation may be provided in parallel, to assist the
>   development of operations procedures when the technology is deployed,
>   for example.  Internal metrics and measurements from Open Source
>   implementations may be the only direct source of performance results
>   in a desired dimension, but corroborating external observations are
>   still required to assure the integrity of measurement discipline was
>   maintained for all reported results.
>
>This text is new and isn't agreed yet, it's my thoughts on the topic.
>Al
>(as a participant)
>
>_______________________________________________
>bmwg mailing list
>bmwg@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email