IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-01.txt

"Aamer Akhter (aakhter)" <aakhter@cisco.com> Tue, 27 March 2012 11:46 UTC

Return-Path: <aakhter@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA73521E81A1 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TmSCG58p2Xig for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F28021E818A for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=aakhter@cisco.com; l=1903; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1332848774; x=1334058374; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc; bh=b4ZxJ6qyU4YG6fBgGhJG0sRQF12NWaaZFT1k0gsNeUs=; b=bx+C3ckQPS2kyU8d50r4oJdI3yNvlEbkpKcTeRZxUsMcJMldXM0JUdDX HiWLjbmI4xy5uNwbCtrnEWOzJ/31Nxydol41rLgie3Ot2bUhRK+cv05go cT2b8tKFNZHOyNBEGCthKvsIb4TQ2XGe7a1l1TDdattFmm6EMWhTKcK7t w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAKWncU+tJV2d/2dsb2JhbABFuD+BB4IJAQEBBBIBHQo/DAQCAQgRAwECCwYYBgFOCAEBBAESCAEZh2gLmlqfDpAsYwSIWJtOgWiDBQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,656,1325462400"; d="scan'208";a="69720893"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Mar 2012 11:46:13 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-102.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-102.cisco.com [72.163.62.139]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2RBkDMe027355; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:46:13 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-101.cisco.com ([72.163.62.143]) by xbh-rcd-102.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 06:46:13 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 06:46:08 -0500
Message-ID: <7F298ACC76CC154F832B6D02852D169F078D5B71@XMB-RCD-101.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F71A6BF.9060400@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-01.txt
thread-index: Ac0MDip/GQaGRiZwTTOXtCSMbRdbSQAAAPfw
References: <20120312194336.5854.36706.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4F71A6BF.9060400@cisco.com>
From: "Aamer Akhter (aakhter)" <aakhter@cisco.com>
To: bmwg@ietf.org, "Sarah Banks (sabanks)" <sabanks@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Mar 2012 11:46:13.0412 (UTC) FILETIME=[36078E40:01CD0C0F]
Cc: mhamilton@breakingpoint.com
Subject: Re: [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-01.txt
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:46:14 -0000

Please find my few comments regarding draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-01
below:

Sec 4.1.1

draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-term is referenced, but I was unable to find
it. 

4.1.4.3. Packet Loss & application flow latency

It would be good to have a discussion regarding the meaning of packet
loss / latency for cases where the transport is regenerated (for example
for WAN optimization cases, or proxies).



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-01.txt
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:43:36 -0700
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
CC: bmwg@ietf.org
Newsgroups: gmane.ietf.bmwg


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories. This draft is a work item of the Benchmarking Methodology
Working Group of the IETF.

	Title           : Benchmarking Methodology for Content-Aware
Network 
Devices
	Author(s)       : Mike Hamilton
                           Sarah Banks
	Filename        : draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-01.txt
	Pages           : 19
	Date            : 2012-03-12

    This document defines a set of test scenarios and metrics that can
be
    used to benchmark content-aware network devices.  The scenarios in
    the following document are intended to more accurately predict the
    performance of these devices when subjected to dynamic traffic
    patterns.  This document will operate within the constraints of the
    Benchmarking Working Group charter, namely black box
characterization
    in a laboratory environment.


A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-01.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-01.txt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email