Re: [bmwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8239 (6763)

Lucien <lucien.avramov@gmail.com> Tue, 30 November 2021 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <lucien.avramov@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE473A14F2 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:29:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HbKij5PZlsjJ for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:29:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74A263A14F0 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:29:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 7so43259328oip.12 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:29:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Epp1DOw0m+HgegIIRZ9i9yNNvSI73vgD9aTJ0UGnU1Y=; b=pRZVjnMPXcxCynTk447Z993bFfIB3U5aPsSn3B82r+VAknuQvDTFai+98OMghPZ+b0 rSLA+rwoG0KyAwhOGWFNFDhHuBlbQfcSzc1/0ilibBdV6pZDJ9/qmKctTiLPpgWxqgLS xzDT3O68xzX+GsYY8Wo2tyJBV7yWWkSd1d0RHHYCQ+NBMCIKv9mlL25ycKTxho9pOHGm 76a2iPqT/+b3OO1imdmDri36HvjWqwLTb0Xpo7CzN/5mBvBBEuqybUWFMc89MPfYNNCA RtwdeinxSD9aZNS0X/FOYRKReLg2z1tHUQOB74siyZJEsU19tP+sW7ft/tytvXpCueJJ yKGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Epp1DOw0m+HgegIIRZ9i9yNNvSI73vgD9aTJ0UGnU1Y=; b=O+Hvi9NvfPI9ALM4K5PvecpwfTaCuwoe8XdFMb0VeWDgQTuC1tgY3qVShbSKQwvRgl ohjl+olWnljKi1u2OT9eHMFOZmdduWowXiBiTl19VwAd0Jfpy6FS1QVqzNXEZjeVOsoy CPHLWbH07vjEQaiO8f+kZdoZUtNrNZKW3vbMqBSPFAsHs00FAEd44eNb8B+TmBlk5OFx CdfyZA06J2ZSCYJy7hcVbpK2yjvRQaqZSgGG9OygrJ8v2+MyELbQXt0FbK6UkpJBr8Wu te1vK/YsnUwf64uJDzjj1X46FIiBPxw3nnh8HP/5RPIbfmdrseUjEDDlsE5EIMaJbMFj EoHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533McyasEi9+k8wR4hutsD2fWumQZlcClm5r0thyTsywsGNM7lrn hjM3PMcNwvEPZLQdtH6/YnY3FCIcq9E2RVgiKSo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMpgx0yl91OkbwXJJqSHILVfZBv3uFXcF53z4Gd2GEaRCQ4xg/3yeQDMKqNbDCbt0h6PhH9kZ2zqWvvyq5lxw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1509:: with SMTP id u9mr1007595oiw.4.1638300543285; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:29:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211130144710.B08B62B28E@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20211130144710.B08B62B28E@rfc-editor.org>
From: Lucien <lucien.avramov@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:28:52 -0800
Message-ID: <CAArZqeVguuzzEyLff6ThV=YTAm-NEkqHqSYRB67z=bR1L000Sg@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: Jacob Rapp <jhrapp@gmail.com>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, rwilton@cisco.com, ALFRED MORTON <acmorton@att.com>, Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net>, hyu@xenanetworks.com, bmwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eafc8c05d2069165"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/gILuO-tG7uTC_ve5kfYyJSo-7h4>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8239 (6763)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:29:10 -0000

Hello,

This errata is incorrect. The original text is correct.

Lucien

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 6:47 AM RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8239,
> "Data Center Benchmarking Methodology".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6763
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Leonard Yu <hyu@xenanetworks.com>
>
> Section: 3.2
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> Last iteration: Ingress port 1 sending line rate to egress
> port 2, ingress port 3 sending line rate to egress port 4, etc.
> Ingress port N-1 and port N will oversubscribe, at 1% of line
> rate, egress port N-3 and port N-2, respectively. Measure the
> buffer size value by multiplying the number of extra frames
> sent by the frame size for each egress port.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Last iteration: Ingress port 1 sending line rate to egress
> port 2, ingress port 3 sending line rate to egress port 4, etc.
> Ingress port N-1 and port N will oversubscribe, at 1% of line
> rate, egress port N-4 and port N-3, respectively. Measure the
> buffer size value by multiplying the number of extra frames
> sent by the frame size for each egress port.
>
> Notes
> -----
> If
> #1, 1->2, 3->4, 5->6, 7->8, ... and N-1->2, N->3
> #2, 1->2, 3->4, 5->6, 7->8, ... and N-1->4, N->5
>
> Then
> #last, 1->2, 3->4, 5->6, 7->8, ... and N-1->N-4, N->N-3
>
> Otherwise, the general equation won't satisfy #1 and #2
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8239 (draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology-18)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Data Center Benchmarking Methodology
> Publication Date    : August 2017
> Author(s)           : L. Avramov, J. Rapp
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Benchmarking Methodology
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>