[bmwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-meth-09.txt> (Methodology for benchmarking MPLS protection mechanisms) to Informational RFC
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Tue, 06 March 2012 17:21 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4099B21E807F; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:21:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id frCoGHyVYb9a; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:21:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E69C21E80A4; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:21:41 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.00
Message-ID: <20120306172141.22860.83507.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:21:41 -0800
Cc: bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: [bmwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-meth-09.txt> (Methodology for benchmarking MPLS protection mechanisms) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:21:43 -0000
The IESG has received a request from the Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) to consider the following document: - 'Methodology for benchmarking MPLS protection mechanisms' <draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-meth-09.txt> as an Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-03-20. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This draft describes the methodology for benchmarking MPLS Protection mechanisms for link and node protection as defined in [MPLS-FRR-EXT]. This document provides test methodologies and testbed setup for measuring failover times while considering all dependencies that might impact faster recovery of real-time applications bound to MPLS based traffic engineered tunnels. The benchmarking terms used in this document are defined in [TERM-ID]. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-meth/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-meth/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
- [bmwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-met… The IESG
- Re: [bmwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-protection… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [bmwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-protection… Jay Karthik (jakarthi)
- Re: [bmwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-protection… Gregory Mirsky