IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-03.txt

Al Morton <acmorton@att.com> Thu, 02 August 2012 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B2921E80B0; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.638
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.638 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.158, BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BYc4EBm54yor; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com [209.65.160.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DC421E8096; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.128.153] (EHLO flpi408.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.11.0-10) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 52b0b105.0.1453556.00-396.4020373.nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (envelope-from <acmorton@att.com>); Thu, 02 Aug 2012 23:20:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 501b0b2608b23a1c-ee6d6abf445dae2f7dcc01eee941675350ecd7a1
Received: from enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by flpi408.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q72NK40K032415; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:20:05 -0700
Received: from fflint04.pst.cso.att.com (fflint04.pst.cso.att.com [150.234.39.64]) by flpi408.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q72NJvOv032227 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:20:03 -0700
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by fflint04.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:19:22 -0700
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q72NJMmU017518; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 19:19:22 -0400
Received: from dns.maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q72NJDkm017183; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 19:19:13 -0400
Message-Id: <201208022319.q72NJDkm017183@alpd052.aldc.att.com>
Received: from acmt.att.com (vpn-135-70-226-91.vpn.east.att.com[135.70.226.91](misconfigured sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with SMTP id <20120802231438gw10025c02e>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 23:14:38 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.226.91]
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 19:18:44 -0400
To: bill@wjcerveny.com, internet-drafts@ietf.org, i-d-announce@ietf.org
From: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <1343940157.1116.140661109974901.339907EA@webmail.messaging engine.com>
References: <20120731152448.19816.81394.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1343940157.1116.140661109974901.339907EA@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <acmorton@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.128.153]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=9G-7cFwNQrsA:10 a=fCmqUfBFqk8A:10 a=ofMgfj31e3]
X-AnalysisOut: [cA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xwOvzTHDVLE4u4]
X-AnalysisOut: [nGvK72ag==:17 a=9EG1XPKN9vD_l3BiNzUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10]
Cc: bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-03.txt
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 23:20:10 -0000

At 04:42 PM 8/2/2012, Bill Cerveny wrote:
>1) Be careful about recommending RFC 2544 regarding IPv4 blocks for
>addressing, as these blocks were listed incorrectly in RFC2544, and
>corrected in an errata ... I seem to recall an IANA response regarding
>this with a different draft emphasizing this point.

Both our IPv4 and IPv6 address blocks are encumbered by Errata,
so the wise author will note this in all bmwg memos.

Al

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email