[bmwg] Housekeeping
Kevin Dubray <kdubray@juniper.net> Tue, 27 February 2001 04:12 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id XAA13749 for <bmwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 23:12:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA08713; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 22:55:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA08623 for <bmwg@ns.ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 22:54:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from red.juniper.net (red.juniper.net [207.17.136.137]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id WAA13447 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 22:54:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from juniper.net (kdubray-dt [172.24.8.71] (may be forged)) by red.juniper.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA03712; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:53:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3A9B24CD.1E26D87F@juniper.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:53:50 -0800
From: Kevin Dubray <kdubray@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [bmwg] Housekeeping
Sender: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
BMWG: The deadline for revising current BMWG I-Ds is Friday, March 2. (see http://www.ietf.org/meetings/cutoff_dates_50.html) A new draft regarding the terminology of diffserv mechanisms benchmarking, draft-ietf-bwmg-dsmterm-00.txt, has been submitted and should be announced shortly by the I-D adminstrator. Other BMWG editors: please directly email me (kdubray@ juniper.net) an update of your draft's status. There was interest regarding the "standardization of benchmarks." An I-D presents what attributes the IESG would scrutinize in consideration of such an action. I draw your attention to: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bradner-metricstest-00.txt Additionally, there was interest communicated in the area of BGP convergence benchmarks. At the end of January, an individual I-D submission, ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berkowitz-bgpcon-00.txt was presented to the BMWG and it was asked if this was a relevant work item. Your input on this list as to whether the BMWG should undertake such a work would be a good thing. It appears that the terminology document regarding Router Resource Reservation benchmarking has been published by the I-D administrator: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-feher-bmwg-benchres-term-00.txt A WG Last Call to undertake this as a new BMWG work item will be sent out in the next few days. Lastly, please email me directly if you have possible agenda items for the BMWG meeting at the upcoming 50th IETF. -Kevin _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list bmwg@ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
- [bmwg] Housekeeping Kevin Dubray