[bmwg] [Errata Verified] RFC2889 (6284)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 10 September 2020 23:00 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9EF3A119B; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CGsCbKgjCU-f; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D48B93A1071; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E1CD4F40771; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
To: blairsu@gmail.com, bob@cqos.com, jerry_perser@netcomsystems.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: warren@kumari.net, iesg@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20200910225958.E1CD4F40771@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/ov296qKmgqfTqnvG6aByYmur8IQ>
Subject: [bmwg] [Errata Verified] RFC2889 (6284)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:00:24 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC2889,
"Benchmarking Methodology for LAN Switching Devices". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6284

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Su Yu Lung <blairsu@gmail.com>
Date Reported: 2020-09-10
Verified by: Warren Kumari (Ops AD) (IESG)

Section: 5.8.3

Original Text
-------------
This test MUST at a minimum be performed in a three-port
   configuration in section 5.9.3.

Corrected Text
--------------
This test MUST at a minimum be performed in a three-port
   configuration in section 5.7.3.

Notes
-----
I thought it means 5.7.3.
If so, the same incorrect link also happened at 5.8.2.

"It is recommended no to exceed the address caching capacity found in section 5.9" should be "It is recommended no to exceed the address caching capacity found in section 5.7"

--------------------------------------
RFC2889 (draft-ietf-bmwg-mswitch-04)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Benchmarking Methodology for LAN Switching Devices
Publication Date    : August 2000
Author(s)           : R. Mandeville, J. Perser
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Benchmarking Methodology
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG