Re: [bmwg] Agenda for BMWG session at IETF-109

Dear Al,

Thank you very much for this opportunity! I understand and accept the 
risk, that we may run out of time and then I will not be able to present 
my slides.

I would like to send my slides to you for a review before the session. 
What is your deadline?

Best regards,

Gábor

13/11/2020 19:29 keltezéssel, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) írta:
>
> Hi Gábor,
>
> sorry for the delay replying – another very busy week here!
>
> We can try to fit in your proposed short presentation on:
>
> results regarding siitperf, my RFC 8219 compliant SIIT tester. (The 
> usage of random port numbers is working well. I'm currently working on 
> calibrating it with a legacy RFC 2544 tester by benchmarking the same 
> DUT with the two devices and comparing their results.)
>
> maybe title and 2 slides (setup and results)?  at the end of the 
> meeting.  we might not have time in which case I hope you understand 
> and we will try to cover the topic at another opportunity. But 
> BMWG’ers will have your slides to review and discuss on the mailing 
> list, in any case.
>
> Al
>
> bmwg co-chair
>
> *From:*bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Lencse Gábor
> *Sent:* Sunday, November 8, 2020 1:22 PM
> *To:* bmwg@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [bmwg] Agenda for BMWG session at IETF-109
>
> Dear Al,
>
> Thank you very much for including our draft, too:
>
>   - An Upgrade to Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect Devices
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lencse-bmwg-rfc2544-bis-00  <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lencse-bmwg-rfc2544-bis-00__;!!BhdT!x5bCGyOmAgXSJkn_g2pPkZsqSPUm5qg8v2yyK3_FZdZ27NBdhsj8zQwjDDPN$>
>     status:
>     - no updated text, but two exchanges on the list:
>     >>>>> add <<<<<<
>
> Unfortunately, we did not have time to progress with the draft. So now 
> we do not have anything to present regarding the draft. But we do not 
> want to abandon it. I hope that we'll be able to progress with it 
> before IETF-110.
>
>     - Several discussion threads related to this draft on list:
>         Many other RFC2544 updates:
>     https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/yEzFCign03ZveEUkvXsEevm8dDU/  <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/yEzFCign03ZveEUkvXsEevm8dDU/__;!!BhdT!x5bCGyOmAgXSJkn_g2pPkZsqSPUm5qg8v2yyK3_FZdZ27NBdhsj8zWLvhnqp$>
>         strict packet time-outs for PDV and the siitperf implementation/tool
>     https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/50qoL0gxTEKGU6CkUwPIf8FO-hc/  <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/50qoL0gxTEKGU6CkUwPIf8FO-hc/__;!!BhdT!x5bCGyOmAgXSJkn_g2pPkZsqSPUm5qg8v2yyK3_FZdZ27NBdhsj8zSKCWhzH$>
>         different source and destination port numbers
>     https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/Y3XIteCBVMScSolsagPH_FNoi_E/  <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/Y3XIteCBVMScSolsagPH_FNoi_E/__;!!BhdT!x5bCGyOmAgXSJkn_g2pPkZsqSPUm5qg8v2yyK3_FZdZ27NBdhsj8zchbk9Re$>
>
> However, I have results regarding siitperf, my RFC 8219 compliant SIIT 
> tester. (The usage of random port numbers is working well. I'm 
> currently working on calibrating it with a legacy RFC 2544 tester by 
> benhmarking the same DUT with the two devices and comparing their 
> results.) If there is interest in the WG for it, I would be happy to 
> present. But I do not want to push it.
>
> So, what do you think?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Gábor
>
>
> 07/11/2020 22:47 keltezéssel, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) írta:
>
>     BMWG:
>
>     The first draft agenda is available [0] for bashing.
>
>     I constructed this agenda based on updated drafts, messages to the list, and some messages to the co-chairs.  IF I OVERLOOKED an item, please let me know!
>
>     There are lots of drafts to read to prepare for a productive session at IETF-109!
>
>     Note the time of the session: 12:00-14:00 UTC+7 on Thursday, November 19, 2020.
>
>     Please check your local time! [1]
>
>     In some time zones, like US PST, this meeting will start and end on Wednesday evening.
>
>     The US PST session is 2100 - 2300, on November 18 !
>
>     Authors, if you are not planning to attend this session, please let me know!
>
>     Al
>
>     bmwg co-chair
>
>     [0]https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/109/agenda/agenda-109-bmwg-00  <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/proceedings/109/agenda/agenda-109-bmwg-00__;!!BhdT!x5bCGyOmAgXSJkn_g2pPkZsqSPUm5qg8v2yyK3_FZdZ27NBdhsj8zR12tFsp$>
>
>     [1]https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20201119&p1=28&p2=37&p3=224  <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20201119&p1=28&p2=37&p3=224__;!!BhdT!x5bCGyOmAgXSJkn_g2pPkZsqSPUm5qg8v2yyK3_FZdZ27NBdhsj8zQr1Tl1V$>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     bmwg mailing list
>
>     bmwg@ietf.org  <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg  <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg__;!!BhdT!x5bCGyOmAgXSJkn_g2pPkZsqSPUm5qg8v2yyK3_FZdZ27NBdhsj8zU14IPVJ$>
>