Re: [bmwg] Jari Arkko's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-04: (with COMMENT)

joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com> Thu, 04 December 2014 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201B01AD3A1; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 07:51:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IPIiR47u9SjZ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 07:51:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x231.google.com (mail-pd0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FE001AD45F; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 07:50:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ft15so17776733pdb.22 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 07:50:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7Yl2EP62mnA/1rJZ+dkL4Vz6JssPnxC6LUJCQeeNnes=; b=WYmvcsr6IKAaM8lSqMyLlcfrw5FIfxdmVraCs7aABYPsosp35MTEuaVCVzr5M+yYNz s3UJUeDdoLpaJ5n4W5CkM7d1z2dyc5sFHrBVb7VI/j/tr1GI/rDegwrYKDqPqRGAXtqB aQYUbY2C27JoSm4VEviWHNktEU7TDhgE0eevRRhJHU8JPAN6aXvBr0Iq/EY27FYXQ97K ntNgS8zEWSYiLbSw1sUNXgs6iQ8BhWSEkNvj0HZZSeRToNvPemXxg8R+WJQ77O7wDd9h iMlC/v0ny4LzTzgqODgj/ZgoUFhDBGb0+hykUwWbD5zaUqHuR7llVpbKTIg3dYlY2gDj DcWA==
X-Received: by 10.68.65.79 with SMTP id v15mr27258554pbs.56.1417708244473; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 07:50:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mb-aye.local ([2601:9:7680:ec8:fd25:adac:8fe0:6406]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cb2sm26551937pac.24.2014.12.04.07.50.42 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Dec 2014 07:50:43 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <548082D1.7040904@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 07:50:41 -0800
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/34.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20141204134240.5401.52358.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141204134240.5401.52358.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/tP3ZJdU4CUaceUTalWs4Dc29YjQ
Cc: joel.halpern@ericsson.com, bmwg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence.all@tools.ietf.org, bmwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Jari Arkko's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:51:53 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/4/14 5:42 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for 
> draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-04: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to
> all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
> cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to
> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more
> information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found
> here: 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence/
>
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 
COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  Shouldn't the conclusions from the discussion after the Gen-ART
> review be incorporated to a new draft version?

well  if you have no major objections I thin this will fall into
approved point-raised because I think there is room to address some of
the outstanding comments.

if you think I should hold it for that, I'll hold the discuss.

> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAlSAgtEACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrJF9ACgg4mV3kndFuYSicIn/moVC9O3
GGgAn3TaIl3Z2oXK77nJFetwXE/ULJVf
=iE3r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----