Re: [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-00.txt

Hi Mike,

Sounds good.

I'll be sure to review the next version.

Thank you,
Barry

-----Original Message-----
From: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hamilton
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:11 AM
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-00.txt

Hi Barry,
Here are my responses to your comments that you made on the last version.
It'll make a few things more clear for you on what specifically I
addressed in the -00 version.

1. More Concise first sentance (Page 1, paragraph 1)
--Modified  to take suggestion
2. Examples of what devices use to make forwarding decisions(Page 3,
paragraph 1)
--Great idea.  
3. Confusing wording on last sentance (Page 3, last paragraph)
--Reworded the entre paragraph to hopefully clear the confusion
4. Out of place sentance (Page 4, paragraph 2)
--Removed the sentance, but would like input on where it does belong
5. Confusing paragraph (Page 4, 2nd to last paragraph)
--Totally reworded to be more succinct
6. Section 3.3 relocation/deletions
--Made the appropriate changes
7. Page 7, 3rd paragraph
--Outstanding point.  Next version will include this discussion on
individual testing
8. Section 4.3
--Interesting point, but would like to add this to topic for discussion in
Taipei
--I'm leaning toward removing it, but leaving in the malformed (since it
can be 
--algorithmically defined)

-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Constantine <Barry.Constantine@jdsu.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:35:17 -0700
To: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>,
"i-d-announce@ietf.org" <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-00.txt

>Hi Mike,
>
>I think the document is making good progress.
>
>I still think a simple HTTP based example laced into the metrics section
>would be very useful for the reader.
>
>Thank you,
>Barry Constantine
>
>JDSU Communications Test
>Principal Member Technical Staff
>301-325-7069
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>internet-drafts@ietf.org
>Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 3:15 PM
>To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
>Cc: bmwg@ietf.org
>Subject: [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-00.txt
>
>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>directories. This draft is a work item of the Benchmarking Methodology
>Working Group of the IETF.
>
>	Title           : Benchmarking Methodology for Content-Aware Network
>Devices
>	Author(s)       : Mike Hamilton
>                          Sarah Banks
>	Filename        : draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-00.txt
>	Pages           : 17
>	Date            : 2011-09-14
>
>   This document defines a set of test scenarios and metrics that can be
>   used to benchmark content-aware network devices.  More specifically,
>   these scenarios are designed to most accurately predict performance
>   of these devices when subjected to relevant traffic patterns.  This
>   document will operate within the constraints of the Benchmarking
>   Working Group charter, namely black box characterization in a
>   laboratory environment.
>
>
>A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-00.txt
>
>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-00.txt
>_______________________________________________
>bmwg mailing list
>bmwg@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>_______________________________________________
>bmwg mailing list
>bmwg@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg