[bmwg] Action Item for DSM Methodology
Scott Poretsky <sporetsky@avici.com> Wed, 06 August 2003 15:46 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA21939 for <bmwg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:46:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19kQUD-0002pQ-97; Wed, 06 Aug 2003 11:46:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19kQTG-0002nR-Ec for bmwg@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2003 11:45:02 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA21886 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:44:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19kQTF-00040f-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2003 11:45:01 -0400
Received: from [12.38.212.174] (helo=mailhost.avici.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19kQTE-0003zy-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2003 11:45:00 -0400
Received: from sporetsky-lt.avici.com ([10.2.104.134]) by mailhost.avici.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h76FjEQl018663 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:45:14 -0400
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20030806113404.0290d850@pop.avici.com>
X-Sender: sporetsky@pop.avici.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 11:47:55 -0400
To: bmwg@ietf.org
From: Scott Poretsky <sporetsky@avici.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_3236764==_.ALT"
Subject: [bmwg] Action Item for DSM Methodology
Sender: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
BMWG-ers, I had an action item from Vienna to send out the list of test cases to be included in the forthcoming DSM Methodology draft. This is provided below for your review and comment. Please let me know if you think additional cases are needed and/or if some of these cases should be broken out into multiple cases. Scott ------------------------------------------------------------- EF PHB EF PHB Forwarding Vector Matches the Expected Vector EF PHB Receives Absolute Priority EF PHB Does not Waste Bandwidth EF PHB Does not Cause Starvation EF PHB Congestion Avoidance EF PHB Rate-Limiting with Packet Drops (Policing) EF PHB Rate-Limiting with Remarking (Policing) AF PHB AF PHB Forwarding Vectors Match the Expected Vectors AF PHBs are Fairly Treated with EF PHB AF PHB Congestion Avoidance AF PHB Rate-Limiting with Packet Drops (Policing) AF PHB Rate-Limiting with Remarking (Policing) CS PHB CS PHB Forwarding Vectors Match the Expected Vectors CS PHB is Backwards Compatible with IP Precedence CS PHBs are Fairly Treated with EF and AF PHB CS PHB Congestion Avoidance CS PHB Rate-Limiting with Packet Drops (Policing) CS PHB Rate-Limiting with Remarking (Policing) Default PHB Default PHB Receives Best-Effort Forwarding Default PHB Tail-Dropped when Forwarding Congestion Exists Default PHB Congestion Avoidance Default PHB Rate-Limiting with Packet Drops (Policing) Default PHB Rate-Limiting with Remarking (Policing)
- [bmwg] Action Item for DSM Methodology Scott Poretsky