[bmwg] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-bmwg-ngfw-performance-00
Kathleen Moriarty via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 08 July 2019 20:38 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77599120041; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 13:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-bmwg-ngfw-performance.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.98.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <156261828836.820.7530581707536369773@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 13:38:08 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/xFol4PAKP2Lvw6wYYMJDdjlK-2s>
Subject: [bmwg] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-bmwg-ngfw-performance-00
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 20:38:09 -0000
Reviewer: Kathleen Moriarty Review result: Has Nits Thank you for your work on draft-ietf-bmwg-ngfw-performance. This is a straightforward review establishing metrics for comparison of SUT/DUT for firewalls establishing measurement requirements as well as acceptance criteria. When crypto is recommended for use in testing, it's current, although it should be noted that this is just for test environments. In terms of security, I think this document is ready with nits. Please add a security considerations section. Feel free to include something like what's above. Section 4.1: Nit Spell out Device under test/system under test on first use. I don't think it comes up that often in the IESG review cycle. I had to look it up and my memory was jogged. Sorry for my late 'early' review!
- [bmwg] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-bmwg-ngf… Kathleen Moriarty via Datatracker
- Re: [bmwg] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-bmwg… Brian Monkman
- Re: [bmwg] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-bmwg… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)