[bmwg] Document Action: 'Hash and Stuffing: Overlooked Factors in Network Device Benchmarking' to Informational RFC

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> (by way of Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>) Thu, 11 January 2007 15:53 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H52Ex-0006ih-98; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:53:19 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H52Ew-0006iH-43 for bmwg@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:53:18 -0500
Received: from mail120.messagelabs.com ([216.82.250.83]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H52En-0002ZG-08 for bmwg@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:53:18 -0500
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: acmorton@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-120.messagelabs.com!1168530787!11356388!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.10.7; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [134.24.146.4]
Received: (qmail 6049 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2007 15:53:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO attrh9i.attrh.att.com) (134.24.146.4) by server-10.tower-120.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2007 15:53:07 -0000
Received: from attrh.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by attrh9i.attrh.att.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l0BFjEnS020250 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:45:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by attrh9i.attrh.att.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l0BFj9OA020237 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:45:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from acmt.att.com (acmt.mt.att.com[135.16.251.54](misconfigured sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with SMTP id <20070111155301gw10010gk3e>; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:53:01 +0000
Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.0.20070111105234.01d52498@att.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:53:01 -0500
To: bmwg@ietf.org
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69
Subject: [bmwg] Document Action: 'Hash and Stuffing: Overlooked Factors in Network Device Benchmarking' to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org

The IESG has approved the following document:

- 'Hash and Stuffing: Overlooked Factors in Network Device Benchmarking '

    <draft-ietf-bmwg-hash-stuffing-08.txt> as an Informational RFC

This document is the product of the Benchmarking Methodology Working
Group.

The IESG contact persons are David Kessens and Dan Romascanu.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-hash-stuffing-08.txt

Technical Summary

  Test engineers take pains to declare all factors that affect a given
  measurement, including intended load, packet length, test duration,
  and traffic orientation. However, current benchmarking practice
  overlooks two factors that have a profound impact on test results.
  First, existing methodologies do not require the reporting of
  addresses or other test traffic contents, even though these fields
  can affect test results. Second, "stuff" bits and bytes inserted in
  test traffic by some link-layer technologies add significant and
  variable overhead, which in turn affects test results. This document
  describes the effects of these factors; recommends guidelines for
  test traffic contents; and offers formulas for determining the
  probability of bit- and byte-stuffing in test traffic.

Working Group Summary

  From the initial work proposal through the final WG Last Call, there was
  wide agreement that this work was important for BMWG in that it added
  key testing considerations to our body of literature.

Protocol Quality

  David Kessens reviewed this document for the IESG.


_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg