Re: [bmwg] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-01.txt
"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Wed, 23 April 2014 03:30 UTC
Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0591A000E; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.473
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.473 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TkPIEmRz3Eme; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [204.178.8.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44EA91A0012; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-255-15.research.att.com [135.207.255.15]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3A4120127; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 23:30:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.242]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70427E0102; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 23:29:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from NJFPSRVEXG8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841]) by njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841%13]) with mapi; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 23:29:58 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>, "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 23:29:56 -0400
Thread-Topic: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-01.txt
Thread-Index: Ac9ehaXZyzfSm/bDRCa6qVIGjOtRLQAHfP9g
Message-ID: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8017944AE5A@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
References: <CF7BE0E3.3061C%terry.manderson@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <CF7BE0E3.3061C%terry.manderson@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/zNuD1sWJzr48uPBEjndUAFoKZmE
Cc: "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence.all@tools.ietf.org>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-01.txt
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 03:30:07 -0000
Thanks Terry. Your posts to the list will no longer be moderated. This concludes the WGLC. The authors have many comments to address, including the list below. A revised draft is requested, and we'll proceed from there. Al bmwg co-chair > -----Original Message----- > From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Terry Manderson > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 7:51 PM > To: rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org > Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic- > convergence.all@tools.ietf.org; bmwg@ietf.org > Subject: [bmwg] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence- > 01.txt > > Hello, > > I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. > The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related > drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes > on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to > the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, > please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir > > Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it > would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last > Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through > discussion or by updating the draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-01 > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-01.txt > Reviewer: Terry Manderson > Review Date: 18/04/2014 > IETF LC End Date: N/A - WG requested Routing Area Directorate review > Intended Status: Standards Track > > Summary: > > I have some minor concerns about this document that I think should be > resolved before publication. > > Comments: > > This document is clearly written and for the most part easy to understand. > The steps are > enumerated, which is very helpful. I would have prefered to see the > reference topology figures repeated closer to the test case where they are > used, but this is a matter of style. > > > Major Issues: > > No major issues found > > Minor Issues: > > Section 3 (figures 1-4): please define The Helper node (HLP) before its > use. It is first defined in section 5.1.2 > > Section 4.5: Please clarify if the interface media types and throughput > must all be exactly the same for all devices in all the test cases, or > that the media types and throughput are to be the same for iterations of > the test cases. I re-read that Para several times and could infer either > situation. > > Section 4.10: Can you please highlight the impact on the tests for where > routing processor redundancy cannot be disabled, or if unwilling to do > that suggest that the impacts or assessment of impacts are out of scope of > this draft. > > Section 5.: Point B. I assume you mean Hard Reset here. For understanding > purposes you may like to consider adding the term in parenthesis. > > Section 5.1.1: Pont B introduces "peer x of Emulator". I find this wording > terse, can you please clarify what this is as I couldn't see in the text > of section 3. > > Point D: "peer-x" is used here. Is this the same term as point B? > > It appears as I read through the points, that Peer-X (possibly > otherwise > known as 'SOME_ASN-X) is the test case nomenclature representation of the > emulator function. It may be worth stating that up front to be pragmatic > and help the reader. > > > Section 5.1.2: > > This section introduces a NTP time source to the test case, that > isn't > described in "Section 3. Test Topologies". While not a critical concern to > someone implementing the topologies, it may help them by highlighting the > necessity of NTP in section 3. > > Section 5.1.5 > > Is the omission of normative language in the points, specifically > A,B, > and C intentional? > > Section 5.5, Point B. The language here surrounding the time source is > different than in earlier text, is that intentional? > > Nits: > > Section 1.1, Para 3: s/functional/functions/ > Section 4.2, Para 1: s/or through neighbor/or through a neighbor/ > Section 4.4, Para 3: s/a)default/a) default/ > s/b)platform-specific/b) platform-specific/ > s/c)values/c) values/ > Section 4.6, Para 3: s/)is/) is/ > > Section 5.1.1, second last para: s/Stand Deviation/Standard Deviation/ > > Section 5.2.1, > Point C. "Tx1", do you simply mean "Tx" as described in Figure 1? > Point C. s/(Tx1)Interface/(Tx1) Interface/ > Point E. s/Trr2/Tr2/ > Point F. "(Drr1)" Can you clarify this is the intended nomenclature > for > this egress interface on the DUT? > > Section 5.3, Point E s/route say/route, say/ - I'd expect the RFC editor > may suggest using "e.g". > > Section 5.6, Point B(6) s/(e.g. route A)/(e.g. routeA)/ - "RouteA" appears > to be the selected form from earlier parts of the draft. > (same for other occurrences in the remainder of the Draft (eg S5.8 > point > N,Q, .) > > > Section 5.8. point F. s/Autonomous System.s/Autonomous Systems/ > Section 5.8. Point S. s/Node -1/Node-1/ > > > Cheers > Terry
- [bmwg] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-c… Terry Manderson
- Re: [bmwg] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-bas… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [bmwg] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-bas… Bhavani Parise