[Bof-srv6ops] Proposed path forward…

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Thu, 09 May 2024 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: bof-srv6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bof-srv6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CF4C14F61E for <bof-srv6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2024 11:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f_ThO3mG0aKy for <bof-srv6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2024 11:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0497C14F617 for <bof-srv6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 May 2024 11:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a59a9d66a51so268767566b.2 for <bof-srv6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 May 2024 11:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari.net; s=google; t=1715277614; x=1715882414; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tWIfwvh2Y+x8gzk/Wh2gYGCLUa9V3jrkc2EMXQ8Yn+E=; b=esht+H2FWXeR2UBorvKPXExBzNK9YWnHm/C37g1N9HOErnPLZru/vOITCg8Ndeqpa9 CUIDsWYTY67ROI83Q74LhHn2EQ8FWIw1rsLZvvmzcDZ/Vi5BhwlOM6i3ouuesIPvqjc8 jRy2sjy42DtQdYUu+/za4scDdxertbTUmk1cluyF1mwe70W+dkJmvSPXhthqQhOldban o2Ee4i+b7IZj9wwnT05XREzRbVdNziiMyunYT5Ux9s2WJ2y2XNrebAZxOe9QBOxPShZC IPSBSMS+XHsoC0DQzSV95B30uMzNfWEFJiQqHp+/TWcq18z6a9cpwDz6I5HpROmYwbsa kxkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1715277614; x=1715882414; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tWIfwvh2Y+x8gzk/Wh2gYGCLUa9V3jrkc2EMXQ8Yn+E=; b=qEZMjRsVTlhCLlT9Eo44n2hyWb2+tUDdsYAOHsgl3UdyuGqeMDH/5HWwEOGmM+VqWF 69LT6B2A8tf210vqzXN2j15M89ncx+eeHXMY3EgHWUUZ6eb4Xt9GmkhyhWjVCMjDLMwF 0xsfG9DOHMjyNyILxhl4eda1BOFgcwFHFsXWAeqQHWYNX/YlYrvxjIoUahro2mzAbFQN ksstIovuvkWfp2DXR1BPG8NvPrdzJiBSuiw+NhKpSXkeVmx1lHpYuI1a3XDedu8JEhqf 6PTEoHSWgEjsISk4QHC9OEI3B5mkYJKWeXq1PAWdkeUxGHva+TwUbfQ5XmEEr5hipvYV C7nw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw0hZnC8IovauDzGjif4QT64kggj6uEcMUL+aYfpH7tdIP6JUpS +7ZVmPxsNoW+QzCIgbG1rgTrIu7PXuB01+TOQ4EgUJ8qSBxxITz8JaI+WBqhwbPdPtrHBd5XEC+ TrTIwitWcyQWuJxXw3d/FqSyg/3BY8B6RVtegKX55GdUWdpAW
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH7DxDNrRU3o4h9WmG2kk1VRdBRNeeaHLa7ZpwFDTAt1zq8NcjNKjt5Gr6rIwJSCksRuj2rYHvMWWOrcAvNuiQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:a40c:0:b0:56d:c928:ad76 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5734d67e8d0mr277259a12.26.1715277613507; Thu, 09 May 2024 11:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 649336022844 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 9 May 2024 13:00:13 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Superhuman Desktop (2024-05-08T19:06:11Z)
X-Superhuman-ID: lvzjzoi6.854cead4-9166-45a8-8597-0401de6d3075
X-Superhuman-Draft-ID: draft002a9c41a653d299
X-Superhuman-Thread-ID: draft00fda78d3b2099dd
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKtwTaK7jpsc4nKH6yTQOAEJgNVuszBjvd4f4JqdqtcvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: bof-srv6ops <bof-srv6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d84b0806180930c5"
Message-ID-Hash: QWCDIBMLUC45GOS6JPFOYFK6GA3FRAVZ
X-Message-ID-Hash: QWCDIBMLUC45GOS6JPFOYFK6GA3FRAVZ
X-MailFrom: warren@kumari.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Bof-srv6ops] Proposed path forward…
List-Id: BoF-SRv6-Operations <bof-srv6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bof-srv6ops/6fdVS_WaWRO78dMm-Cd-0fI9Ztk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bof-srv6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:bof-srv6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:bof-srv6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bof-srv6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:bof-srv6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bof-srv6ops-leave@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 17:27:48 -0000
X-Original-Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 13:00:13 -0500

Hi all,

Firstly, thank you all again for making the BoF successful, and apologies
for how long it has taken for this update.

Jim Guichard, Dhruv and I have had a number of discussions about the best
way forward; there was clearly a significant amount of operational topics
raised during the BoF, and so clearly there is interest… but there are also
clearly landmines which people pointed out, and which we need to avoid.

These include:

1: Concerns around clarity about where specific work would be performed —
we have many existing working groups (including SPRING and V6OPS) which
relate to SRv6, and we don’t want conflicts.

2: Minimizing the potential for conflict between the (proposed) SRv6OPS WG
and SPRING. A conflict within a WG is bad, but it becomes worse if it turns
into a cross-WG fight.

3: Having SRv6OPS impose (non-operational) requirements on SPRING, or
artificially constrain what SPRING (or 6MAN or V6OPS, or…) is developing.

Many of these concerns can be mitigated by better coordination and
collaboration, and so what I am proposing is chartering an SRv6OPS Working
Group in the Ops Area, but with Jim (who is the AD for SPRING as the
responsible AD). We also added “The Segment Routing (SR) instantiation on
the IPv6 data plane is referred to as SRv6” to help clarify the
relationship between SRv6 and IPv6.

We also tweaked the charter to hopefully foster collaboration and
coordination - this includes things like clarifying the scope, and the
relationship between SRv6OPS and other working groups, specifying that the
chairs will discuss document adoption with the AD, etc.


I’d like to start the chartering process soon, but Jim, Dhruv and I also
wanted to share the plan and the tweaked charter so y’all are aware.


The charter:
https://github.com/SRv6-Operations/IETF119-SRv6-Operations-Bof/blob/main/SRv6OPS-Charter.md

The updates:

https://github.com/SRv6-Operations/IETF119-SRv6-Operations-Bof/compare/aa36362~5...aa36362


Thank you all,
Warren, Jim and Dhruv.