Re: [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by address" terminology
dthaler1968@googlemail.com Thu, 18 April 2024 12:46 UTC
Return-Path: <dthaler1968@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: bpf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bpf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A055C14F6A7 for <bpf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.845
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.845 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id huJSj1FSFnvj for <bpf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACBD7C14F6F4 for <bpf@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2a87bd53dc3so710113a91.2 for <bpf@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20230601; t=1713444402; x=1714049202; darn=ietf.org; h=thread-index:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:message-id:date:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AS5SxMXGcrO91LnCOcUj7QnqlzGCqZXoeT1579YFhr4=; b=VI20Qdw1brYzzAdqibfTcXrj68m9TaQ1X5Jbr8WBcH5jmtlS/wHaaHZBIfmIqPDKUo nO8GQdrzPJavJISlgZNGrwshYFOcImlFfarGn3YYXzokHKFdlrd6x5oMfTv94mlI3sFo XHWu3fNWky88sgOMF0lTr1sPUMG3viIdGEJfl1HzAuPQngj3Vryo+QqtEQje77f+vreg FTTSYkjmg4QrFcuWgSrRBOrMuco2TFII5PdzuDFqgXV59922aaR/TmJwOM6aVt6TPVKB JikJIazBfZVIz7n4gshI4i+z8d6NQR6ozzDNhUh5aMLSIrHZkIJ677aW8Lj9m1Q+II3I ucbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713444402; x=1714049202; h=thread-index:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:message-id:date:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AS5SxMXGcrO91LnCOcUj7QnqlzGCqZXoeT1579YFhr4=; b=E883vPjAh08M+2/GYU4c/rPMPVbg4dhUp/O7nTvmva7YzdzUf53Vcu7MyoxIkzLitX BhuVDtKBC2WqckpBnWP6YInOGWS7zGhxkvT9nrmpyGzxtqLB1yhNHaSMcCmiFdNU2Spz L3BtzjXsvD3R+kXP9HFcnioAfcqL4rAbdS3WJWJd5404SiEWKP6LkzA2QzOOVvB7wopw Ezl72lh9FxLWSFRsza3N0z9Fq8SwyNzk0RAlIe3eABwfpGGrmv21+7kqo3Kb8UpAh1RE MMhNwFBg8Z+E3zYbs85LeoUracqG+devc1C4BzMxoG8YT0kgsFU1yOLVU73RfHg9UgxQ rShg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXGV7GtjVLdPzSLUUdE3jEF7Z6HqGnWiOSDW0A/aEQBtwTJDyTf+5DrAMcf/3XtiQ2/ixBWkbNeyLEQask=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxq74FXwbrtlpYG7Dk4tfqwa1aB+7ZxfA2N71YlxrYQ6n+a2Zvf VUIyA+ZLjI4sQk+oPa8P+kagbOPNzwO/24ZsaUm+YtxggOE+IbYot8bu3L9B
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHGB2xteWs17x8CKXd6eMv3zNzPXyIlPHSItkrMfu31Xblx203SmlDGLi09a3r0trtmOUQArQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c688:b0:2a2:fc17:db81 with SMTP id n8-20020a17090ac68800b002a2fc17db81mr2326992pjt.40.1713444401673; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ArmidaleLaptop ([12.129.159.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b24-20020a17090aa59800b002a67b6f4417sm3089544pjq.24.2024.04.18.05.46.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: dthaler1968@googlemail.com
X-Google-Original-From: <dthaler1968@gmail.com>
To: 'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@infradead.org>, dthaler1968=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: 'Watson Ladd' <watsonbladd@gmail.com>, 'David Vernet' <void@manifault.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org, bpf@ietf.org
References: <0a0f01da8795$5496b250$fdc416f0$@gmail.com> <20240405215044.GC19691@maniforge> <CACsn0cmWzT4-+g0w0-ETC5ZMC1hdW0v-Rh1ZNCG2O23m9YCALQ@mail.gmail.com> <003001da8907$efd41140$cf7c33c0$@gmail.com> <ZiDFRI3sdClyG-dj@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZiDFRI3sdClyG-dj@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:46:38 -0700
Message-ID: <004d01da918e$74b407b0$5e1c1710$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQGym9lSVor9R6wjkVDgbvdbCMHIbgJp4F1KApIu0eEBfB5hlwKy7T0BsXSL+2A=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bpf/coUiD3Xg49-CeCBlppTh6Vo13sE>
Subject: Re: [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by address" terminology
X-BeenThere: bpf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of BPF/eBPF standardization efforts within the IETF <bpf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bpf>, <mailto:bpf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bpf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bpf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bpf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf>, <mailto:bpf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:46:47 -0000
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: > Maybe "static ID", or "pre-assigned" id? I'd be ok with either of those. If I don't hear otherwise, I'll create a patch using "static ID". Dave
- Re: [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by a… Watson Ladd
- [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by addre… dthaler1968
- Re: [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by a… David Vernet
- Re: [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by a… dthaler1968
- Re: [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by a… dthaler1968