Re: [Bpf] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter-ietf-bpf-00-04: (with COMMENT)

[Erik Kline <[e-mail]>]

Thanks.  Murray had similar feedback the first time around.  My
personal preference is to let the chairs sort out reasonable time
estimates for the charter-defined milestones, though I've taken a stab
at the first big objective.

This working group is necessarily a bit different, at least at the
outset: there's going to be some period where the two communities
figure out a working style (some source text edited in the kernel
tree, some other text in other repos, etc -- the combined output, of
course, in the datatracker).  I wanted to give time for this to shake
out.

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 7:44 AM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
<[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-bpf-00-04: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-bpf/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> There are a number of proposed document which don't appear to corresponding
> milestones.  Consider if they should be enumerated.
>
>
>