[Bridge-mib] Re: [newtrk] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-newtrk-decruft-experiment-00.txt
"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Wed, 21 September 2005 15:58 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EI6zR-0006hp-9o; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:58:33 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EI6zP-0006he-TH for bridge-mib@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:58:31 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA00915 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:58:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpout1.bayarea.net ([209.128.95.10]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EI75Q-0006bG-EF for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:04:47 -0400
Received: from shell4.bayarea.net (shell4.bayarea.net [209.128.82.1]) by smtpout1.bayarea.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j8LFwPBT012946 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:58:25 -0700
Received: from shell4.bayarea.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell4.bayarea.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8LFwItC021084; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:58:18 -0700
Received: from localhost (heard@localhost) by shell4.bayarea.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id j8LFwI2R021080; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:58:18 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: shell4.bayarea.net: heard owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:58:18 -0700
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
X-Sender: heard@shell4.bayarea.net
To: "Bridge-Mib (E-mail)" <bridge-mib@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <E1EFJbF-0005EX-Ar@newodin.ietf.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10509210852360.12614-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464
Subject: [Bridge-mib] Re: [newtrk] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-newtrk-decruft-experiment-00.txt
X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: bridge-mib.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:bridge-mib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: bridge-mib-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: bridge-mib-bounces@ietf.org
Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line > Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the > New IETF Standards Track Discussion Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Getting rid of the cruft: an experiment to identify > obsolete standards document > Author(s) : E. Lear, H. Alvestrand > Filename : draft-ietf-newtrk-decruft-experiment-00.txt > Pages : 11 > Date : 2005-9-13 > > This memo documents an experiment to review and classify Proposed > Standards as not reflecting documented practice within the world > today. The results identify three classes of documents marked as > Proposed Standards that should be considered for retirement in some > way or another. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-newtrk-decruft-experiment-00.txt BRIDGE-MIB folks -- FYI, among the documents that the above draft proposes to move to HISTORIC is RFC 1525, Definitions of Managed Objects for Source Routing Bridges. If this reclassification is thought to be inappropriate, please notify the Newtrk WG and/or the draft authors. //cmh _______________________________________________ Bridge-mib mailing list Bridge-mib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib