Re: [btns] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-07.txt
Julien Laganier <julien.IETF@laposte.net> Wed, 16 July 2008 12:25 UTC
Return-Path: <btns-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: btns-archive-1@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-btns-archive-1@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1693A6A31; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14C13A6B4C for <btns@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qG-iwjju71fs for <btns@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.184]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470153A68BA for <btns@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so3454405fkq.5 for <btns@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; bh=erEk3cYoUMnOjq6WckdOscseBZKxlfqtbdJUBsMCg7E=; b=iadUScfEN2+6sjRoUIEfMSP08YqJ1btauPgRPE6gECfNITAFIhP//Ui6zIAcf87A8H 7HpXmPxJwz/6SkckQEEnwO1VvCf7wlrWWWBebS/PGMK/aHcZSPjGqETjuU/oLrZKP0ez z3F15u6liEt1xha1kPcO61qJg/8Al15m7oTJQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id:sender; b=nF7DhAqE4CfK9kR/3qPoaOk1fakwiPdaQh65CbtuE1t3KDPHUhdq7WPB/r97FdhIrv jgJzqNKM8MD/CJYXVfkLh/Apb1w97knYdOAsZpXnoiUtvE9m5uJ9Tl70vOVFow+ydQLS HfnAwr6+9zCPZxJZVCA26tVlYNJ3cGS+AWgB4=
Received: by 10.187.238.1 with SMTP id p1mr1595423far.67.1216211168759; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from klee.local ( [212.119.9.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm1612768hub.11.2008.07.16.05.26.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julien Laganier <julien.IETF@laposte.net>
To: btns@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:26:07 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
References: <20080708233001.8BD5D3A6AB4@core3.amsl.com> <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A0C85A0@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A0C85A0@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200807161426.08261.julien.IETF@laposte.net>
Cc: Tim Polk <tim.polk@nist.gov>, Black_David@emc.com
Subject: Re: [btns] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-07.txt
X-BeenThere: btns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Better-Than-Nothing-Security Working Group discussion list <btns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/btns>
List-Post: <mailto:btns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: btns-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: btns-bounces@ietf.org
Folks, As David hinted below, we're issuing another 2 weeks WG last call ('til July 30th) before returning this draft to our AD. --julien, BTNS co-chair On Thursday 10 July 2008, Black_David@emc.com wrote: > The changes in this version of the PS/AS draft primarily respond to > Steve Kent's IETF last call comments. Due to the extensive nature > of the changes, I believe the WG chairs plan to hold another WG > Last Call. On behalf of the draft authors, I apologize for the > delay in producing this draft revision. > > Thanks, > --David > ---------------------------------------------------- > David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer > EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 > +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 > black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 > ---------------------------------------------------- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org > > [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > > Internet-Drafts@ietf.org > > Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 7:30 PM > > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > > Cc: anonsec@postel.org > > Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-07.txt > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > > directories. > > This draft is a work item of the Better-Than-Nothing Security > > Working Group of the IETF. > > > > Title : Problem and Applicability Statement > > for Better Than Nothing Security (BTNS) > > Author(s) : J. Touch, D. Black, Y. Wang > > Filename : draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-07.txt > > Pages : 30 > > Date : 2008-7-8 > > > > The Internet network security protocol suite, IPsec, requires > > authentication, usually of network layer entities, to enable > > access > > > > control and provide security services. This authentication can > > be based on mechanisms such as pre-shared symmetric keys, > > certificates > > > > with associated asymmetric keys, or the use of Kerberos (via > > KINK). > > > The need to deploy authentication information and its associated > > identities can be a significant obstacle to the use of IPsec. > > > > This document explains the rationale for extending the Internet > > network security protocol suite to enable use of IPsec security > > services without authentication. These extensions are intended > > to protect communication, providing "better than nothing security" > > (BTNS). The extensions may be used on their own (this use called > > Stand Alone BTNS, or SAB), or may be used to provide network layer > > security that can be authenticated by higher layers in the protocol > > > > stack (this use is called Channel-Bound BTNS, or CBB). The > > document > > > > also explains situations for which use of SAB and/or CBB > > extensions > > > > are applicable. > > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-0 >7.t xt > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > > Internet-Draft. > > _______________________________________________ > btns mailing list > btns@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns _______________________________________________ btns mailing list btns@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns
- Re: [btns] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-ap… Black_David
- [btns] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic… julien.laganier
- Re: [btns] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-ap… Julien Laganier