Re: [Cacao] Call for CACAO Charter Consensus

Bret Jordan <jordan.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 10 May 2019 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <jordan.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cacao@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cacao@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EEA120094 for <cacao@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n9xPgNIKOdfF for <cacao@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A4C3120074 for <cacao@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id 198so8375656wme.3 for <cacao@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=5C+bhKQiFgQL2snjjWtmMdktN6Mxwku/yz8pizvarzo=; b=F7Fo5RY8jL0tdIuurye8qjhzX7619vfbXUnrzYxO/CmE2Dw4uc0C7McirJ5Kg2pky8 4ejkTMKUI1OPjxm5PQo8JIlyi0cQ5/mXZu33Wo/5wXzgKwiXBD28yxiuaE+pJDtSHYDa jVyGGiikt7JcNyJ3S2wJ/umWvB28Wh7tkyBaCuGbWySYBESGEljYbwZyj0k6NrHh4aNx 49DddYvIU5N0QVDFVqHde/rdd1LaMC6FPCS5Zez30uz8BFF+CQHn8MBA7gQzuW0+8VQA R/kdAKdYAUd2v3IX2p6gb2Wcuf+aGWU84iaePnwROYJJSIVziZd8uqcRSN6XHWNk6VfN ZWAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=5C+bhKQiFgQL2snjjWtmMdktN6Mxwku/yz8pizvarzo=; b=XWOLTk+b/L56DAlOlgzA0KGDR+dhkyG4XfNeix2cZIHM6DHEIGnRCL2WkmFXEw1KNE /sd2jdXScl5nbTu5KwAxkXRJH8s8Zf/B5J8Keeh6B25Yy/AyRunJcRsR4gKnPxHaUfXt adUCevYRfjBIEI8KI9N4QbMAH8yS9jV8aF/IQywdk+S4emCrX+BswXICgb6XI2oiMPac Q1WfRjvjxxwMY2uoyMyKNmrgq8AzRvV2vl6xFucF9t2X9etrEXBY3QBXvxJrOEyZwp5w Q39wwdQVsJOOUJlk3brZnBp1R9DYg9MErlSL9Eso22lff0EJAM3LjPOG/cNDBVqp8ZkL IPKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXc6y727QiMrXQDx6zm6a7UqirLEKLgmZj1OgiF48Lh2qf0w52y O46LL6WQB1kyTrGmm+8B0oYADQj7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyCgN8zhfJQPB+vwqwhuFysH+tp2d+f+jDxUVU/0BeQjxKg32Cu4qF7BvcAmUW97R90pQqRMw==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7216:: with SMTP id n22mr2962302wmc.111.1557509490982; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.15.227] ([167.98.10.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a20sm13388317wrf.37.2019.05.10.10.31.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 May 2019 10:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bret Jordan <jordan.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <27ECF723-3375-4874-B5F4-37CD3B086B95@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1D88930B-2840-406D-A4A6-1E349DD753D6"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 18:31:28 +0100
In-Reply-To: <F8FEA2B9-B0EE-409E-A864-A54A56729CD9@interdiscount.ch>
Cc: cacao@ietf.org
To: Carolin.Baumgartner@interdiscount.ch
References: <CAOgPGoAkj_QqPUzZe+O1W3f=P=EqARE5GCu6kMeO76kBWUK27A@mail.gmail.com> <F8FEA2B9-B0EE-409E-A864-A54A56729CD9@interdiscount.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cacao/ITdS5A4XvrP7hqVlHyWJTSs6zAQ>
Subject: Re: [Cacao] Call for CACAO Charter Consensus
X-BeenThere: cacao@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Collaborative Automated Course of Action Operations <cacao.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cacao>, <mailto:cacao-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cacao/>
List-Post: <mailto:cacao@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cacao-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cacao>, <mailto:cacao-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 17:31:36 -0000

I obviously fully support this work.  I will write documents, write code, and review documents.   This work is really the next step beyond CTI and is critically needed.  


Thanks,
Bret
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."

> On May 10, 2019, at 2:52 PM, Carolin.Baumgartner@interdiscount.ch wrote:
> 
> I am still interested and support the charter. I am not sure what to make out of this sentence though
>  
> “The working group may decide to not publish the use cases and requirements; and test documents.”
>  
> I am willing to review documents
>  
> Carolin
>  
> From: Cacao <cacao-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:cacao-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net <mailto:joe@salowey.net>>
> Date: Friday, 10 May 2019 at 15:39
> To: "cacao@ietf.org <mailto:cacao@ietf.org>" <cacao@ietf.org <mailto:cacao@ietf.org>>
> Subject: [Cacao] Call for CACAO Charter Consensus
>  
> At the CACAO meeting at IETF 105 in Prague there was significant interest in the CACAO problem statement.  We want to reach consensus for a charter for a working group.  A draft charter has been posted to the list [1]..
> We need to continue this discussion on the email list as well as gauge continued interest in participating in this work.  Please do so by responding to the following questions:
>  
>   1.  Do you support this charter text (full text also provided at the end of email or at [1])?  Please submit objections or blocking concerns to the list.  
>   2.  Are you willing to author or participate in the development of the drafts of this WG?
>   3.  Are you willing to help review the drafts of this WG?
>   4.  Are you interested in implementing drafts of this WG?
>  
> Please provide comments including proposed text changes ASAP to provide ample time for discussion.  This call for consensus ends on May 27, 2019.
>  
> Thanks, 
> Joe & Chris
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cacao/QKVvohhYvwU46jcsLYyYY1agPTU <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cacao/QKVvohhYvwU46jcsLYyYY1agPTU>
>  
> Charter text copied below:
> --------------
> # Introduction
> To defend against threat actors and their tactics, techniques, and procedures, organizations need to manually identify, create, and document prevention, mitigation, and remediation steps. These steps when grouped together into a course of action (COA) / playbook are used to protect systems, networks, data, and users. The problem is, once these steps have been created there is no standardized and structured way to document them, verify they were correctly executed, or easily share them across organizational boundaries and technology stacks.
>  
>  
> This working group will create a standard that implements the playbook model for cybersecurity operations. 
>  
>  
> This solution will specifically enable:
>  
>  
>  1. the creation and documentation of COAs in a structured machine-readable format
>  2. organizations to perform attestation including verification and authentication  on COAs
>  3. the sharing and distribution of COAs across organizational boundaries and technology stacks that may include protocols, apis, interfaces and other related technology to support sharing.
>  4. the verification of COA correctness prior to deployment.
>  5. the monitoring of COA activity after successful deployment. 
>  
>  
> This solution will contain (at a minimum) a standard JSON based data model, a defined set of functional capabilities and associated interfaces, and a protocol. This solution will also provide a data model for systems to confirm the status of the COA execution, however, it will be agnostic of how the COA is implemented by the system.
>  
>  
> Each collaborative course of action, such as recommended prevention, mitigation and remediation steps, will consist of a sequence of cyber defense actions that can be executed by the various systems that can act on those actions. Further, these COAs will be coordinated and deployed across heterogeneous cyber security systems such that both the actions requested and the resultant outcomes may be verified. These COA actions will be referenceable in a data structure like the OASIS STIX V2 model that provides support for related data such as threat actors, campaigns, intrusion sets, malware, attack patterns, and other adversarial techniques, tactics, and procedures. 
>  
>  
> Where possible the working group will consider existing efforts, like OASIS OpenC2 and IETF I2NSF that define the atomic actions to be included in a process or sequence. The working group will not consider how shared actions are used/enforced, except where a response is expected for a specific action or step.
>  
>  
> # Goals and Deliverables
> This working group has the following major goals and deliverables
>  
>  
>  - CACAO Use Cases and Requirements
>    - Specify the use cases and requirements
>  - CACAO Functional Architecture: Roles and Interfaces
>    - Specify the system functions and roles that are needed to enable Collaborative Courses of Action
>  - CACAO Protocol Specification
>    - Specify and standardize the configuration for at least one protocol that can be used to distribute courses of action in both a direct delivery and publish-subscribe method
>  - CACAO Distribution and Response Application Layer Protocol
>    - Specify the protocol which may include apis, interfaces and other related technology to support the requirements identified for the protocol. 
>  - CACAO JSON Data Model
>    - Create a JSON data model that can capture and enable collaborative courses of action
>  - CACAO Interoperability Test Documents
>    - Define and create a series of tests and documents to assist with interoperability of the various systems involved. 
>  
>  
> The working group may decide to not publish the use cases and requirements; and test documents. That decision will be made during the lifetime of the working group.
> -- 
> Cacao mailing list
> Cacao@ietf.org <mailto:Cacao@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cacao <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cacao>