IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-caldav] I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-caldav-11.txt (fwd)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 14 April 2006 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org
Delivered-To: ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org
Received: from laweleka.osafoundation.org (laweleka.osafoundation.org [204.152.186.98]) by leilani.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916C87F8BC for <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by laweleka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8291B142279 for <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from laweleka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (laweleka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25256-09 for <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by laweleka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D68F1142258 for <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2006 18:53:58 -0000
Received: from p508FC13F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.178.21]) [80.143.193.63] by mail.gmx.net (mp005) with SMTP; 14 Apr 2006 20:53:58 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
Message-ID: <443FEF47.3050406@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:51:51 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-caldav] I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-caldav-11.txt (fwd)
References: <D58B890CEBB86771C83E8401@Cyrus-Daboo.local> <443FAB85.8030503@gmx.de> <7246CAD3-9329-4B34-8D23-08B196E80EDE@osafoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <7246CAD3-9329-4B34-8D23-08B196E80EDE@osafoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 tagged_above=-50.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00
X-Spam-Level:
Cc: CalDAV DevList <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Calendar Access protocol based on WebDAV <ietf-caldav.osafoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-caldav>, <mailto:ietf-caldav-request@osafoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/ietf-caldav>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-caldav-request@osafoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-caldav>, <mailto:ietf-caldav-request@osafoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:54:02 -0000

Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> Should we simply remove the claim about what RFC2616 says and continue 
> to make these requirements?  (If not, do you have a proposal for solving 
> the problem?)

I think neither CalDAV nor RFC2518bis should make any statements about 
this issue, but draft-whitehead-http-etag. This who care about this 
issue should join the discussion on the HTTP mailing list.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email