Re: [Ietf-caldav] New draft

[Julian Reschke <[e-mail]>]

Cyrus Daboo schrieb:
> Hi folks,
> Following the last IESG review there was push-back on i18n issues wrt 
> text comparisons done in the calendar-query report. As a result we have 
> now added support for collations as defined in 
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14.txt>. 
> This involved a whole new section (7.5) and modification to the 
> text-match element.
> 
> The basic change was to eliminate the caseless attribute in text-match 
> and instead add a collation attribute that takes the name of one of the 
> supported collations on the server. With this, the text comparison 
> operation will follow the well defined rules of the collation.
> 
> The link to the draft is here:
> 
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dusseault-caldav-15.txt>
> 
> An HTML diff from the previous version is here:
> 
> <http://ietf.osafoundation.org/caldav/draft-dusseault-caldav-15-from-14.diff.html> 

Thanks.

I just read 7.5 (not the subsections), and it's a bit weird that the 
spec mandates normative behaviour for edge cases where a client violates 
MUST level requirements... Please be more conservative in throwing in 
RFC2119 keywords...

Best regards, Julian