Re: Some comments Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML
Doug Royer <Doug@Royer.com> Fri, 11 November 2005 19:58 UTC
Return-Path: <Doug@Royer.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org
Delivered-To: ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org
Received: from laweleka.osafoundation.org (laweleka.osafoundation.org [204.152.186.98]) by leilani.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1980A7F52F for <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:58:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by laweleka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C611422AC for <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:58:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from laweleka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (laweleka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32173-02 for <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:58:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from S4.cableone.net (s4.cableone.net [24.116.0.230]) by laweleka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF281422A2 for <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:58:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.168.10] (unverified [69.92.70.67]) by S4.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S4) with ESMTP id 36615468 for multiple; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:16:25 -0700
Message-ID: <4374F7FF.1030702@Royer.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:58:55 -0700
From: Doug Royer <Doug@Royer.com>
Organization: IntelliCal.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040805 Netscape/7.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Hare <TimHare@comcast.net>, ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org
Subject: Re: Some comments Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML
References: <DC0D384E-4CCB-4B93-8068-CFC8E565B66B@wsanchez.net> <43727541.8080501@Royer.com> <F71B0B62-732B-4689-AEBC-133BF5DCD035@wsanchez.net> <F677E5D86402E5966E725FF8@ninevah.local> <58BE2800-2263-43A4-85D2-1B9C95011EC8@wsanchez.net> <6.2.1.2.0.20051111120239.03c20c30@mail.comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20051111120239.03c20c30@mail.comcast.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms050004060506040700020801"
X-SpamDetect: *: 1.250000 NakedCR=2.0,Aspam=-0.8
X-NakedCr: Body contained naked cr characters
X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii;
X-IP-stats: Incoming Outgoing Last 1, First 93, in=128, out=124, spam=0 Known=true
X-External-IP: 69.92.70.67
X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 tagged_above=-50.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL
X-Spam-Level:
X-BeenThere: ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org
List-Id: Discussions on Calendar Access protocol based on WebDAV <ietf-caldav.osafoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-caldav>, <mailto:ietf-caldav-request@osafoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/ietf-caldav>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-caldav-request@osafoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-caldav>, <mailto:ietf-caldav-request@osafoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 19:58:59 -0000
Tim Hare wrote: > ,,, I just re-skimmed Doug Royer's xCal draft > (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-royer-calsch-xcal-03.txt) and > I don't see the line ending problem addressed there either. iCal object hard code the two character \ followed by N in their data as defended in 2445 so iCal data represented in xCal does not need to worry about newlines embedded in property or parameter values. Hard coded newlines and carriage returns in iCal data are for line wrap only, they are not part of the data and can be ignored, per 2445. My XSLT -> iCal code DOES terminate each iCal line with \r\n when it translates the code back to iCal format. So yes, xCal does address the problem. -- Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com -------------------------------|----------------------------- We Do Standards - You Need Standards
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Bernard Desruisseaux
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Tim Hare
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Doug Royer
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Lisa Dusseault
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Scott Carr
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Helge Hess
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Scott Carr
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Helge Hess
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Scott Carr
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Bernard Desruisseaux
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Helge Hess
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Bernard Desruisseaux
- Re: Some comments Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs.… Doug Royer
- Re: Some comments Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs.… Doug Royer
- Some comments Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRL… Tim Hare
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Doug Royer
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Doug Royer
- [Ietf-caldav] icalendar vs. CRLF vs. XML Wilfredo Sánchez Vega