IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [calsify] Request for preliminary review of JSContact property registrations

Neil Jenkins <neilj@fastmailteam.com> Tue, 05 March 2024 01:22 UTC

Return-Path: <neilj@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41A4C1C4DB1 for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:22:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b="HorI1vdO"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="YmRrXZ+M"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uC2tznYKKnxy for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:22:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wfout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.145]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0948BC18DBAB for <calsify@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:22:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D547C1C00081 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 20:22:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 04 Mar 2024 20:22:13 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from :from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1709601733; x= 1709688133; bh=SwBNDoWcyRtn/ko5rq5ALmgZQ+UV2ITCJnGvXu10+wc=; b=H orI1vdOatFXqmG1pRHbqeb9p4lbyn8rzpKKtfDEgd0KMpH6L3Il834E1IGAwn/sZ YQeYZcJxSput3uGCqCVVGUt8S72nLPh0ebRcHM63P4i2g2+z8WVLp/AYYTU3vjNj JfuJ9r0960mwX1qq+JqNldb/TFD1qMDkniYQWXCdq30aC4ecuyJ1clLPEkD4cFao kk+Px/YfYu2CkTD92wnqKR2VWq0uOTn/RSxtxaEkjrlcg65IDZcA7ERBYCy1L3e+ 0xqe+F5Uht8d5js+QAi88Up6rTEF9U0V/jgZq5OkrQWX5ZdeOZDCVXBhgdvUteUf CUJDLV7JHOhPitEX+8wvQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1709601733; x=1709688133; bh=SwBNDoWcyRtn/ko5rq5ALmgZQ+UV 2ITCJnGvXu10+wc=; b=YmRrXZ+MmVpgiUY1yT/yTgY0mSRopKmW7xhaHdBWDHRM vINmpp8g0Us0ZHQaUo891xGqkjhqiddzq9bOzI5O2dZaxlx5RTFkkr8UFZZwLeV+ o1tfRx0xAyIodzRqzuwdvjDuuwcEsSeb9N/8zeigXDOquUaiPMxd3kbxcyq3uTgY KFhUZKditE15dFCrNMI+rjMeqE2FM7Mp7fAVzsHosAVHgAHBN3oB8t56u0uYo0Et A/rwYp8QyFCa/v9GphDIX6evKqFQPAvkoE6ij+bNZjLHKSMm8aYLSVGw2klqGOFT kuiDfY485Gjm5QzEKoXZsM5SBR/UddRC+1nShRPCjw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:xXPmZXc_yOIobt_XBtoT1dVlgNH8Ft5kYY_r3S74x81FYfxCVAmZVA> <xme:xXPmZdML8nPBAZUcQ5DypZCgsvJw5hUVj8C0-Eqe345JnCwhg0Uh-OY6yfv0A4pQH CzyHEBbHqgF-A>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrheekgdefvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtre erreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdfpvghilhculfgvnhhkihhnshdfuceonhgvihhljhesfhgr shhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevvdetvdduleekhf eghfetfeettdelhfehfeevffevleekuddtudffieevjeevhfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhi iigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnvghilhhjsehfrghsthhmrghilh htvggrmhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:xXPmZQjzkqwk0G4fZrwK_fdf_m7zswwbHD5blOuPrLJ6siouNMWoGw> <xmx:xXPmZY8WLsGnm8nC3cSqPFojytlaU8pqsUpZWHNRmk6-TxgeaWr5Ow> <xmx:xXPmZTvZ-7Ig5Yfd1Nv90VFSkTn-6TZSYfyGD22_CUOiW1I58BEHvg> <xmx:xXPmZQ7GznmXGIeoXsoB7Akbz6aKnmEOY2jphyEZQOeGfGNnfMIWg_SrIu8>
Feedback-ID: ibc614277:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2BD342D4007D; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 20:22:13 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-208-g3f1d79aedb-fm-20240301.002-g3f1d79ae
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <bc0e443c-4f15-45c6-92d9-3618866760b9@dogfoodapp.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a8d09652-d840-4ff2-b85e-fbc89d5b437c@app.fastmail.com>
References: <f090ffad-18ca-4ad1-8483-bae0d9117f69@dogfoodapp.fastmail.com> <a8d09652-d840-4ff2-b85e-fbc89d5b437c@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 12:21:52 +1100
From: Neil Jenkins <neilj@fastmailteam.com>
To: calsify@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="7ef9b98b9b3c4340a2ff9f207478a850"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/3VDpyWRJ2RhfiNqLVRsdlZzAi_4>
Subject: Re: [calsify] Request for preliminary review of JSContact property registrations
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Calendaring and Scheduling Standards Simplification <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 01:22:19 -0000

Thanks Robert. I have made the relevant changes in the source files, I will upload a new draft as soon as submissions are allowed again (we're in the lockout period before Brisbane now). Alternatively, this edit can be made by the RFC editor during the editorial process; I don't think we need to hold up progressing the document on publishing a draft with these changes.

Cheers,
Neil.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email