Re: [calsify] I-D Action: draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations-09.txt

[Michael Douglass <[e-mail]>]

Mark Nottingham passed on the following comment:

>                In addition to the values defined here any value defined in	
>   	      [RFC8288] may be used.  However these uses SHOULD be documented in	
>   	      an RFC updating both [RFC5545] and [RFC8288]
>
> It's not necessary to update 8288 to register a new value, and doing so would likely be knocked back by the IESG. I'd suggest you remove that bit.
I guess I should change that to

In addition to the values defined here any value defined in	
[RFC8288] may be used.  However these uses SHOULD be documented in	
an RFC updating [RFC5545]


On 1/23/22 22:27, [e-mail] wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Calendaring Extensions WG of the IETF.
>
>          Title           : Support for iCalendar Relationships
>          Author          : Michael Douglass
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations-09.txt
> 	Pages           : 19
> 	Date            : 2022-01-23
>
> Abstract:
>     This specification updates the iCalendar RELATED-TO property by
>     adding new relation types and introduces new iCalendar properties
>     LINK, CONCEPT and REFID to allow better linking and grouping of
>     iCalendar components and related data.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations/
>
> There is also an htmlized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations-09
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations-09
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> calsify mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify