[calsify] Re: Working Group Last Calls: the JMAP Calendars/JSCalendar group - EXTENDED

[Bron Gondwana <[e-mail]>]

This WGLC is now concluded (sorry for the delay, I had some urgent travel come up) and these documents are all ready to be sent to the IESG.

*Daniel:* you are the shepherd for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar-icalendar/ and https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-icalendar-jscalendar-extensions/ - can you please confirm that you are still happy with your shepherding statements and submit them both to the IESG.

*Orie:* you're still listed as the "responsible AD" for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-calendars/ and Joris may no longer be available to shepherd it.  I'm happy to take over Shepherding duties or find someone else.  Also - should we transfer this to *Andy*?

*Andy:* you are the responsible AD for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-jscalendarbis/ - and possibly for all of these once the dust settles.  Can you please release it for IETF last-call along with the rest of this batch.

Thanks,

Bron.

On Wed, Sep 2, 2026, at 11:19, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> This WGLC is extended for one more week until *September 10th* due to a significant enough change coming up during the call that the authors have requested additional time for you all to review the `privacy` field issue.
> 
> Please leave any comments if you have concerns or comments about the changes being made for that, or any other WGLC responses.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bron.
> 
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2026, at 21:02, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> Hi All,  I'm emailing both groups for awareness since this is a set of related documents across two working groups.
>> 
>> This email starts a two week "Working Group Last Call" for the entire group of documents; despite them being in different statuses, they are all interrelated so it makes sense to seek consensus to advance them as a group.  I'm checking again as there have been edits to these documents since they went into their current statuses.
>> 
>> The documents are:
>> 
>> From CALEXT:
>> 
>> draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar-icalendar-25 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar-icalendar/> (in WGLC)
>> draft-ietf-calext-icalendar-jscalendar-extensions-06 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-icalendar-jscalendar-extensions/> (in WGLC)
>> draft-ietf-calext-jscalendarbis-18 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-jscalendarbis/> (in AD Evaluation)
>> 
>> From JMAP:
>> 
>> draft-ietf-jmap-calendars-28 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-calendars/> (in RFC Ed Queue)
>> 
>> The authors believe the entire set is now ready for publication, and seeks consensus from the two groups to proceed.
>> 
>> Please reply by *Thursday, September 3rd* with any feedback.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Bron.
>> 
>> --
>>   Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd / Fastmail US LLC
>>   [e-mail]
>> 
>> 
> 
> --
>   Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd / Fastmail US LLC
>   [e-mail]
> 
> 

--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd / Fastmail US LLC
  [e-mail]