Re: [calsify] [External] : [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5545 (7332)

[Tobias Subklewe <[e-mail]>]

Yeah,

this will work. Though I think it would be nice to have two differing 
datetime examples. I'm fine either way.

The grammar issue is a nice catch. Did not see that.

On 04.02.23 14:29, Bernard Desruisseaux wrote:
> Thanks Tobias!
>
> The issue was also present in RFC2445.
>
>   * https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2445#section-4.3.9
>
>
> I would add UTC in the text rather than removing the 'Z' in the 
> example, and fix the grammar as well!
>
> Correct Text:
>
>       The period _starting_ at 18:00:00 _UTC_, on January 1, 1997 and 
> lasting 5
>       hours and 30 minutes would be:
>
>        19970101T180000Z/PT5H30M
>
> Thanks,
> Bernard
>
>
>> On Feb 4, 2023, at 3:58 AM, RFC Errata System 
>> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5545,
>> "Internet Calendaring and Scheduling Core Object Specification 
>> (iCalendar)".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7332__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!L6gFuabr9gpjhMKQIgFVEpkCMd_6GmT6dQmUysMz_X0IVDYneZSkBxF3n65B4iGFzRN22CWpYpeC40Zki3siplsZ4-X-UuIc$ 
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: Tobias Subklewe <[e-mail]>
>>
>> Section: 3.3.9
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> The period start at 18:00:00 on January 1, 1997 and lasting 5
>> hours and 30 minutes would be:
>>
>> 19970101T180000Z/PT5H30M
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> The period start at 18:00:00 on January 1, 1997 and lasting 5
>> hours and 30 minutes would be:
>>
>> 19970101T180000/PT5H30M
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> I do not know if this is an editorial or technical issue.
>>
>> If I understand the datetime value (Section 3.3.5) correct the last 
>> character should only be "Z" if the value is in UTC.
>>
>> In the first example in section 3.3.9 UTC is explicitely mentioned 
>> but not in the second example.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC5545 (draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2445bis-10)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Internet Calendaring and Scheduling Core Object 
>> Specification (iCalendar)
>> Publication Date    : September 2009
>> Author(s)           : B. Desruisseaux, Ed.
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Calendaring and Scheduling Standards Simplification
>> Area                : Applications
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>