Re: [calsify] draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar - thoughts

Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com> Mon, 13 May 2019 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <douglasroyer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D61812006A for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 14:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xiugnV-Xm4if for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 14:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B1FB120019 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 14:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id z4so11295167iol.0 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 14:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:subject:to:references:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=c5yeoiw50jwllxPQrQTQkwDT1PPzIAG7AL3PLbdC4JI=; b=leLX01ITSMG4YYUssRXacvCFO+b+evvDnI+u9xIqTs3ILpk4oBKPlUxk4AEyx3o88d XHKsM70a5udL7Jw3rflRLb259F2UMXiXs0BMoySj8t+3fx9c0WboMREcF4r10m/qlNQK /J9dl6F+3cXA/RIgsNvfURLC0uppW6FCd9v7Dsb3EFL8EEuk9zB6oG/VKTeWgoi8wysa Cm89vFEbE5mezGNsi7SGOEprZnLrmrKTaWk+NIRkgQKo99Q0KitbiJDKwaiMimHIj/1d 7mhFW9OdcOASf9uJZpDqjQOK/mGgjTuNAyVSWzpxYTLkEeRwSSH3kewhU1cW1itP8eSc um/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=c5yeoiw50jwllxPQrQTQkwDT1PPzIAG7AL3PLbdC4JI=; b=EPozA+Gylv4AqTc/rHu/fONGIhUTjK4avPJ1N6Ga5L7W3GPJ+Ejcb+SbjjA20lUJRM HyB2VICfBkUGHTaIeDqdcVvS+TgR9WnYfD1CsdWuUxJguWPvEs+idWWigoudINrhFWrM HWpbN9t0r6VWRa8519YwcDYavjpHd1labfNLMHqMGELBX0aQ71NtnYQkR9lSZloq6lf3 Y/robBdiyyTZ9R4rm6EQtgcm8Y/7fK9jKdG3UfXcT8uMOIqHUbi2947crztFhoMSs/ot ckZ3gp2WntMz6d3bygQzsl3VrPRQ1yKCCqews+Z4HWnRxUYChUBRf8lgx9lD59Of3W/S Fp/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUZaDC75WmB7jn26zq0a5bt/LRPflruSI38bYQQ8BEaTb9VDEGs +ou7oRljzVtT1gohdIVgbIEUNrNR75kf
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwLWaOPKdaFUbS4mU20HsneIDrHWkFng4Z1poCZciG/44UfWLsD1F+5rLpnKCraXJRYqbWAZw==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8cc7:: with SMTP id k7mr18594763iot.194.1557781976964; Mon, 13 May 2019 14:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.7] ([174.27.51.111]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z19sm5192178iol.24.2019.05.13.14.12.55 for <calsify@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 May 2019 14:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Doug Royer <DouglasRoyer@gmail.com>
To: calsify@ietf.org
References: <cb1b4ab3-3aaf-e22e-e7cd-2b45bad5cb87@gmail.com> <9c2a894f-2ab1-4a05-9ced-885f1801155a@beta.fastmail.com>
Organization: http://SoftwareAndServices.NET
Message-ID: <699bca56-ecd3-b142-0a32-3635eed5237c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 15:12:55 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9c2a894f-2ab1-4a05-9ced-885f1801155a@beta.fastmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms070300070506060005000603"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/ew0jO9NswPoDApnMQtW8kc2av4c>
Subject: Re: [calsify] draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar - thoughts
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 21:13:00 -0000

On 5/13/19 8:56 AM, Robert Stepanek [Masked] wrote:
> Preview: Doug, many thanks for your feedback - much appreciated. Pleas

> On Sat, May 11, 2019, at 7:53 PM, Doug Royer wrote:
>> I initially read the draft and updates with the idea that it was another
>> representation of iCalendar.
>> [...] So I re-read this draft with replacement in
>> mind. These are not necessarily problems, just thoughts and questions.
> 
> I am not sure what you mean by "replacement" and "representation", so 
> let me clarify my point of view:
> 
> JSCalendar defines a data model and format for calendaring data, as an 
> alternative to iCalendar. It shares a lot of concepts with iCalendar, 
> but it deliberately isn't 100% compatible. If by "representation" you 
> mean "a different format to express exactly the same thing", then 
> JSCalendar isn't a representation of iCalendar.

I mean as described in the ietf@ietf.org list email as described in my 
original post to this list.

> As to replacement: ...

Thanks for the replies ... new drafts to read ... :-)




-- 

Doug Royer - (http://DougRoyer.US)
Douglas.Royer@gmail.com
714-989-6135