Re: [calsify] Z, UTC, DATE, DATE-TIME, comparing and clarification
Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com> Fri, 21 June 2019 21:47 UTC
Return-Path: <douglasroyer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77A312008A for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3t8Jc3y4nS2f for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com (mail-pl1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A456120019 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id bi6so3599555plb.12 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:subject:to:references:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LT0pPhYGFKpcScZwCHMimj6QBQGg6jDY9TE79Et2FS0=; b=P/RD9Cc+tJSWpixIbyzz8EXhfXkeZzQPPv1cPMwq5NNGXLJUuXxPifz+S9xtAW09EY be7ZI5j6UCN+tGZRt9hiYotdJDwJqkV+PttR0BvgOyjManSTxjgm0MYw2Bif+z/K8rk4 dVmhOU5lKVu41FayfrOZeaNWAgEwDpw9JPCGfTFHnF2sZzq1atKd3g8HKv3M1RHTtPXQ YqQkSJ0a1maHaQTdPVkQkHzHhlPkk5DgLfxFqbFGWAXi1TgsdAKlglyIA3Y3QuH9ib8z 2cCMlN34UdHTiKfDjkphugzWJdn++ULAfFAd30abW38hNNC80OvqoR5lSVtxMlt8FAf9 YVGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LT0pPhYGFKpcScZwCHMimj6QBQGg6jDY9TE79Et2FS0=; b=hFYZBDz0IkqBQm3ffo2zyvJf0Pk9k1ns3FG152SXPqgSVIzXD6tWDpcKM5jEd+/3XO F2vRVoo5cLQ7bO3c1blkxH6owEpn4WBgZQZUnFHHqUCZMWnxxLuAZGwOZiZyg5MhVXU5 ngiiBmL3nnykc6wkyp/ecG0oDrYpYoRprl7Nwp+XzBJA54qrJsWm4rSi3PNVn36NC7te puKRJ41zObhlvfjIp6CBhpNq0oo1hfbBlhKyWjWOKeNVsoHq3TsQzg6hNsw2GV0mXdMS UEOcuoEMBlxZsQQhLuCl1mZsZBEZ+JCW2ikEiQ0A+NfGAAW1r+0Kljj+r6wS2tPh4WkR jLvA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWkz3VI51Wyc528s9VBD/Hs/OTUSEnk6pJC6tmFhNW3UXuk4N2C wGG02P34IEp/9QhcBb5a2hQcHbrLlPyf
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxG4L9ZvTgVBdKXbvEEfucU/zB0cNKDzzmCL/dBkXAXLwIYrHpK4CDKK+PXGLQXInlR2SVgBw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7883:: with SMTP id q3mr132109649pll.89.1561153671485; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.7] ([174.27.68.92]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g8sm3765362pfi.8.2019.06.21.14.47.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Doug Royer <DouglasRoyer@gmail.com>
To: Michael Douglass <mikeadouglass@gmail.com>, calsify@ietf.org
References: <2bf763c5-6e44-3283-7941-857b19ea4b22@gmail.com> <87bb7b1f-7334-2c6f-7099-49c6f631ed81@gmail.com>
Organization: http://SoftwareAndServices.NET
Message-ID: <995c7a60-88ad-9a93-1f0c-b04d2041225b@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 15:47:50 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87bb7b1f-7334-2c6f-7099-49c6f631ed81@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/jgbYzosv3PW1X9ftY1MsGZ3udtk>
Subject: Re: [calsify] Z, UTC, DATE, DATE-TIME, comparing and clarification
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 21:47:54 -0000
On 6/21/19 3:27 PM, Michael Douglass wrote: > > On 6/21/19 17:21, Doug Royer wrote: >> >> >> (B) For the purpose of comparison specifically declare that: >> >> YYYYMMDDT000000 >> >> is the same value as: >> >> YYYYMMDD >> > I'm not sure that's correct. A date value at the moment implies ANY time > with that date. It depends what you're trying to achieve. Where is the implication in 5545? When sorting them on the user interface, are they randomly placed as you find them? Or do you place VALUE=DATE items first? -- Doug Royer - (http://DougRoyer.US) Douglas.Royer@gmail.com 714-989-6135
- [calsify] Z, UTC, DATE, DATE-TIME, comparing and … Doug Royer
- Re: [calsify] Z, UTC, DATE, DATE-TIME, comparing … Michael Douglass
- Re: [calsify] Z, UTC, DATE, DATE-TIME, comparing … Doug Royer
- Re: [calsify] Z, UTC, DATE, DATE-TIME, comparing … Michael Douglass
- Re: [calsify] Z, UTC, DATE, DATE-TIME, comparing … Doug Royer
- Re: [calsify] Z, UTC, DATE, DATE-TIME, comparing … Doug Royer