IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [calsify] draft-daboo-icalendar-rscale-04 editorial nits

Gregory Yakushev <yakushev@google.com> Wed, 08 October 2014 13:24 UTC

Return-Path: <yakushev@google.com>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3554F1A1A42 for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 06:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.164
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.164 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zl_AfVltseJo for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 06:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x229.google.com (mail-vc0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D78C51A19F9 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 06:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hy4so6797133vcb.0 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 06:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=BWZr3tW/Rz4Mfra1JWWDK41EaRLV3GC7WgcG9tkq/EM=; b=X0vnJXrTOUT7HuJh8wTAr4U02FD17UQZ9rG8RjOSNwonCuMMiZneOq/udAE88ZnX9e zE1bYg1nZy2+HacwQUWPFKdzyWKAcu9rpQK3QPMdh3z+TxJn1nA3x1yds3vRkW0Azy4h Eu5M0daLySGKcNCyfCRgoe+jDkKYDKbWopfapVVaah8W0JRdW9U9Zu6lK048eGj8ZnRB lzDeJLmqY1Z8xllVSpvPtIAHSCGFWomckzC0pImnRSH2vLu2T694+IQEAyoeKUM+cgwq ywFGcXneVqbgT2oPce0p0wSjIKIrWFAeMdz5Or3Ywg1wiI5p2zA+7djTyzA8lkFJdqUU z8cA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=BWZr3tW/Rz4Mfra1JWWDK41EaRLV3GC7WgcG9tkq/EM=; b=ZHltvEqWOqxgqyjd+AWY5oR5U6Jy1L6thACxcS9g5+Se06i/g4guJa+f3QTSZ6LflF mt126jIBq3OtF/pw8pjQT2WyCiixf5A9031OAfejcKFJ9DUOVjmVZ2v9w9mPcWkEIH/K uNIhxXkI7XhFc6ytVmeiGp9gRVGfqUm7Zlb0x2MMwXYSu+lzqXVt704+SKC9upvsiyjo E4n/Lw6DNypzFS8iBnuC8JmzHTIthixQZnl2zdaRd4GDkcdGH7y+5HxMUCoXCMU3AfYp 6Ing29sk76CAACL4Mco5oHmAi3/aMbUuorFcAyS3dxlbah6MXLhdFmrHaMOFA2JdVl2w G6tw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmsX6a7mhAhycaC9atSIAJ1r7rYMpsjSGNtmLu6InM6s4jKLcbxMFNp8hJCJ9MqBT8+DAR8
X-Received: by 10.220.6.7 with SMTP id 7mr10167531vcx.1.1412774642610; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 06:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <FDF2BEB55679BADC1A5A0D51@cyrus.local> <5430229D.7050300@andrew.cmu.edu>
From: Gregory Yakushev <yakushev@google.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:24:01 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJxDCqW=L1utXCxj+uNCZ_zpbPhFbiOg5tmCCEQ7p++onYXf+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, calsify@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3e27eb891d50504e93a4b"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/qZaq8kdq5pyAckEHKr9F8KY0Lps
Subject: Re: [calsify] draft-daboo-icalendar-rscale-04 editorial nits
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:24:10 -0000

On Sat Oct 04 2014 at 6:39:14 PM Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:

> On 10/04/2014 12:28 PM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> > Hi Ken,
> > Thanks for your review. I will apply fixes to the WG -00 draft which I
> > am working on now.
> >
> > --On October 3, 2014 at 9:32:04 AM -0400 Ken Murchison
> > <murch@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Section 3, last sent: Since iCalendar uses ISO weeks, should we say "The
> >> number of whole [ISO.8601.2004] weeks in a year is either 52 or 53" ?
> >
> > Well the ISO things refers to how weeks are numbered not actual weeks
> > in a year - there are always 52 whole weeks in a year (if you start
> > counting from 1st January). I would be willingly to clarify the text
> > with this change:
> >
> >    The number of whole weeks in a year is 52 (though the [ISO.8601.2004]
> >    week numbering scheme used by iCalendar [RFC5545] can have a numeric
> >    count up to 53).
>
> Right, I may have over-analyzed this one.  This existing text is
> probably fine, but let's see if anyone else comments.
>
>
>
> >> Section 11.1, UNICODE.CLDR: Should we use the following URI rather than
> >> picking a particular release?
> >> http://www.unicode.org/repos/cldr/tags/latest/common/bcp47/calendar.xml
> >
> > I have updated that to the latest release. However, I am not sure
> > about doing what you suggest given that this is a normative reference.
> > I would have thought a "stable" reference is preferred rather than a
> > "moving target". It would be good to get some feedback from the
> > chairs/ADs/RFC-Editor (or anyone else) on that.
>
> That's a good question.  Let's see what the IETF/IAB folks say.
>

I don't have a strong opinion on this, but leaning towards a 'moving
target' link. We use this reference to point out that the registry is
maintained externally, and we make no specific assumptions about its
contents in our document. So I don't think there's a strong case for
pointing to a specific version in this particular case.

 Grisha


> --
> Kenneth Murchison
> Principal Systems Software Engineer
> Carnegie Mellon University
>
> _______________________________________________
> calsify mailing list
> calsify@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email