IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [calsify] JSTask and estimatedDuration --- well done!

Marten Gajda <marten@dmfs.org> Fri, 25 May 2018 11:23 UTC

Return-Path: <marten@dmfs.org>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55485126C26 for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 May 2018 04:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dmfs.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6onvKIdo_qdm for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 May 2018 04:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailrelay3-1.pub.mailoutpod1-cph3.one.com (mailrelay3-1.pub.mailoutpod1-cph3.one.com [46.30.210.184]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9478F1204DA for <calsify@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2018 04:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dmfs.org; s=20140924; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to: references; bh=KKmqc5WzdVQ0sq0K0x/Igel5TAPkqq2OAoVz/ArGRh8=; b=y/svnumMFZGejYSDcNz2CS1ywSzZWa/hObLgvpFoK16jBxVBdLCCkue466ULQPYHOsPcyk8kBdFqv clh2ZjtKXzyI6cDAWNqHd/475h7svh2AUq5z4PFAFyIL9iUuZUjOfsnE9kGtymvFNs1x59SpUHEDfY QCufFt1579wASIUM=
X-HalOne-Cookie: 2c3b2aa1ad6855dbc16e106a77550c7db7d82b7c
X-HalOne-ID: fa0de164-600d-11e8-80a6-d0431ea8bb03
Received: from smtp.dmfs.org (unknown [91.47.32.197]) by mailrelay3.pub.mailoutpod1-cph3.one.com (Halon) with ESMTPSA id fa0de164-600d-11e8-80a6-d0431ea8bb03; Fri, 25 May 2018 11:22:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from boss.localdomain (boss [192.168.2.105]) by smtp.dmfs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFB621F5 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2018 13:22:57 +0200 (CEST)
To: calsify@ietf.org
References: <e6e0117c-68d5-d220-e613-eaff7019ce27@dot.ee>
From: Marten Gajda <marten@dmfs.org>
Message-ID: <528c3677-426e-6718-3e24-ceab61833fdb@dmfs.org>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 13:22:57 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e6e0117c-68d5-d220-e613-eaff7019ce27@dot.ee>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8572CC668C423E1D831B6D05"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/xp2m2tfjVQeo5iz3MFfgQ76OxVE>
Subject: Re: [calsify] JSTask and estimatedDuration --- well done!
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 11:23:05 -0000

Hi Andri,

estimatedDuration originally has been added in another extension to
VTODO: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-apthorp-ical-tasks-01#section-6.1

So you'll be able to use it in VTODO as well. However, at present it
looks as if the JSTask spec will be ratified before the VTODO Extensions.

Cheers,

Marten



Am 25.05.2018 um 12:59 schrieb Andri Möll:
> Just wanted to thank whoever brought estimatedDuration over VTODO's
> duration to the table! Ever since I learned VTODO's definition of
> DURATION (DTSTART+DURATION being merely an alternative to
> DTSTART+DUE), I wanted to suggest JSTask not take that path. I'm happy
> to see the task's start, due and duration properties are all independent.
>
> Bothering to mention estimatedDuration SHOULD be less than due minus
> start is a tad peculiar though --- scheduling enough time for oneself
> is a human concern, after all. It'd be like the spec suggesting
> "completed" be set to a time before the due time for the person to not
> be reprimanded for going over their deadline. :)
>
> Andri
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> calsify mailing list
> calsify@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify

-- 
Marten Gajda
CEO

dmfs GmbH
Schandauer Straße 34
01309 Dresden
GERMANY

phone: +49 177 4427167
email: marten@dmfs.org

Managing Director: Marten Gajda
Registered address: Dresden
Registered No.: AG Dresden HRB 34881
VAT Reg. No.: DE303248743

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email