[Can] Addressing IESG comments on CAN charter so far

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 14 February 2023 09:23 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: can@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: can@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73ED3C1522CD; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 01:23:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FU2wcsrLsLDg; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 01:22:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7D07C1516FF; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 01:22:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 31E9Mpdq003520; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:22:51 GMT
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C904604B; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:22:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC714603D; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:22:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:22:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([85.255.232.225]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 31E9MnS3013776 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:22:50 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: jgs@juniper.net
Cc: 'can' <can@ietf.org>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:22:49 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <03a901d94055$e90fb9a0$bb2f2ce0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AdlAVcg2mGbpc8wLSpW28dBW/e45Mg==
X-Originating-IP: 85.255.232.225
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=20221128; bh=2cqP3kFAQTSa+4FMS8pQC R1lAWNKhOsIZElPr47NgLk=; b=k7opaigYvfQVyj/bHXE5kXNUyLI/BplmP5jtr EVDh59M67gLikdJlRfT8EeSOy84O8UX8aTFEN+Oanho+VrEgEArdxG5G5MZp1vIJ KiQNwneXU+jdGcDJNXGFPTnZiQSU0/cEkhNlP+BG1IRBmo9UmWjXU64j16whR+D+ NXjXtkFMcgaK+wHUM6Kv5nb9EAVO5xfCw0xbF0wZBHiefHj1xBpSQB03jy+6zXtB df37jFP2fpxvfelQ+iq/Mk5dk8Tbji2A/wX9gvu4DAxStPbJFxXFHzU0AJmo5kv5 J/y6z4PodbTWKu4bZ1wMop08JKjyeoqB64o4S/moJZFSDYYDA==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27446.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--0.937-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--0.937-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27446.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10--0.936700-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: RTC/st8+7P8OwAmmWH5kBC3QRa32Pa9pWNzsSg1t7V4R/noA8sNkvari LyBzWEx967m6KrIPLRP7mnKaXm1for4rLaI8HzqgCtzGvPCy/m47mQGUgiNPMqI0r0nZSC3ipzs ZuyrSmcoPwBO16/3EcDFASg6b8zCwb6hKQMUlaWxOzgBH9wRPMrF1THLshp8dcfUXDpFHiE/O2b 8zqqoEt+F2C81rWlNPm7vhclmASkpNfs8n85Te8v7E6GNqs6ceKzfM9B6IRt76C0ePs7A07Qsfa qMZktsdbWTKtUWGdDSNhg2klZomDwKcaJ0OmKhPuzSg4xq0ZA0=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/can/4qIK6CCrJFDvPrJ7porkgq8CbU8>
Subject: [Can] Addressing IESG comments on CAN charter so far
X-BeenThere: can@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: CAN- Computing-Aware Networking <can.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/can>, <mailto:can-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/can/>
List-Post: <mailto:can@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:can-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/can>, <mailto:can-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:23:00 -0000

Hi,

Martin Duke : Block : Cross-domain
Opinions from list : Not in immediate scope
Proposal :
OLD
The assumed model for the CAN WG is an overlay network, where a network
edge node makes a decision based on the metrics of interest, and then
steers the traffic to a node that serves a service instance, for example
using a tunnel. Architectures that require the underlay network to be
service-aware are out of scope.
NEW
The assumed model for the CAN WG is an overlay network, where a network
edge node makes a decision based on the metrics of interest, and then
steers the traffic to a node that serves a service instance, for example
using a tunnel. The CAN WG will initially focus on single domain models.
Architectures that require the underlay network to be service-aware
are out of scope.
END

===

Martin Duke : Comment : ALTO present tense wording
Opinions : Mailing list suggestion to clarify difference in scope wrt ALTO
Proposal : 
OLD
The IETF has done past work on exposing network conditions to endpoints
(notably ALTO) and load balancing/service selection at layers 4 and 7
(for example, related to the selection of SIP servers). Specific
characteristics that may distinguish CAN from other work include the
desire to integrate both network and compute conditions in the
optimization function, and the desire to operate that function on nodes
within the service provider's network, logically separated from service
operation.
NEW
The IETF is working on exposing network conditions to endpoints
(notably ALTO) and load balancing/service selection at layers 4 and 7
(for example, related to the selection of SIP servers). Specific
characteristics that may distinguish CAN from other work include the
desire to integrate both network and compute conditions in the
optimization function, and the desire to operate that function on nodes
within the service provider's network, logically separated from service
operation. Exposure of network and compute conditions to applications
is not in the scope of CAN.
END

===

Cheers,
Adrian