IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Captive-portals] FW: New Version Notification for draft-larose-capport-architecture-00.txt

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 10 March 2017 02:59 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C3112952D for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:59:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SmPk9CkuQvEg for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:59:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2592E129502 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:59:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id v125so146939022qkh.2 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 18:59:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kRR+8OtMkHr8nhlrIGEZsXz9w1TmU1EmqlgTsg/J5C8=; b=YzKy/mQ8Cy/ZabEOGB9UzPVEQ76eGKAvLnORQr9M9uZUBYi8mgz/VI125blQvX1cwF epHz+2YVRtz4I9a/IQeriLvzpkAwF2GsiizXZZASJELmVSZlsNoago4CMUAg+mrrhiss S5HNJnUbn+JBRIsUdJngCZlRURtsLD6R2/gMLYlb4adWWwzlE+/zNxKx7JEInfEX0an4 hcXF2AOKTt8uSHMszx0twzvrMVUP78C9tZB6m5nSxtjZIhHXGG5lK3bif1HAPd+2AjLR QpsEvM8tTagz1uflYSq3sJ338BqKL6mV9YTPoLU8lggcF+lQ+OmwpouK4cqkPbMJLgGz 0TLg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kRR+8OtMkHr8nhlrIGEZsXz9w1TmU1EmqlgTsg/J5C8=; b=dxS/V0fnvtnsS6KOHrREz9diSpxbreHHgGQob6x5cqjLqUynj1iV0GGTEv+EQY/Ktb gOSkeNt06z5zSKTnnkbD3KI9BWQ4HTPwws18Y5p78c9QxSo+MAOwvSDyvPU4vf7Fs6B3 CRLV5qPTwezwL4Z9MC/3XKCD/aQtZTMzgi73s5ukvm8UozjWqanD9RZX0aA1J6GW4JxA H9c68DIWzwAEfU42IqmkpdNrGjl/wbK1wlWyGwDPMBYYQacvgoCo6rlQByKWujy8JiJm tF4K65fArkgWijk1KWfo/1h/1Cu/T0po5xYhXRBcLoVU0zasOp3DMfHDCQGDWbsdPVk0 zuCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lbJyN39hXQ4f6ACyrdJ9p/dS3aNBqcCFBF9eItuEMRz3kjFX8ADshQcsnq/yzqjEnU7qzwhRnt6yZGnw==
X-Received: by 10.200.46.91 with SMTP id s27mr18016539qta.278.1489105044567; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 16:17:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.19.112 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:17:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20170310001253.8499287.50558.142467@sandvine.com>
References: <148909812984.5791.13927658190997966571.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D76BBBCF97F57144BB5FCF08007244A77058CF7F@wtl-exchp-1.sandvine.com> <CABkgnnUC9N0_Bb2P-=6+iOg3FuxqNAve-hgCVxWb3Sh+zHRb_w@mail.gmail.com> <20170310001253.8499287.50558.142467@sandvine.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:17:24 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnW8eywFDB_duE1Omy7m5S+TKpLfAEg4komdrxXefb9XMA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/65VwUNyMUIG_97fPRlbd_bEs1EY>
Cc: Kyle Larose <klarose@sandvine.com>, "captive-portals@ietf.org" <captive-portals@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] FW: New Version Notification for draft-larose-capport-architecture-00.txt
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 02:59:36 -0000

On 10 March 2017 at 11:12, Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com> wrote:
> ‎I think a separate draft might be appropriate for the API.

Yep.  I wouldn't expect this doc to get sidetracked too much.

> To take an initial stab at it, we think a GET to the ‎URI provides a JSON document of information and menu choices, since we've heard of a lot of different ideas about how User Equipment might want to navigate the captive portal. Clearly this will need to be standardized.

Agree.  Also, there seems to be some expectation that the URL gets fed
to a browser, so the portal would need to be able to distinguish that
from a JSON document approach.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email