[Captive-portals] The architecture requiring that the API be secure

[Kyle Larose <[e-mail]>]

Hey everyone,

Issue #6 in the architecture draft (https://github.com/capport-wg/architecture/issues/6)
was raised to point out that we should really mandate that the API be secure.

Basically, we want to make TLS a requirement, not a suggestion, so I've changed the
wording around TLS to reflect this. I also added a section to the security section
discussing the motivation behind the requirement.

I haven't submitted a new draft with these changes yet; they're still on github in a pull
request.

Let me know if you have any comments or concerns.

Thanks,

Kyle

Disclaimer:
This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the intended recipient(s) only and may contain information that is considered confidential, proprietary, sensitive and/or otherwise legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication. Thank you for your cooperation.