[Captive-portals] Which portion of packet is used for capport enforcement?
Kyle Larose <klarose@sandvine.com> Sun, 04 March 2018 16:51 UTC
Return-Path: <klarose@sandvine.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B321242F7 for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 08:51:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.93
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.93 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2bOhkdK2SDzj for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 08:51:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.sandvine.com (Mail1.sandvine.com [64.7.137.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA0081200F1 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 08:51:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from WTL-EXCHSV2-2.sandvine.com (192.168.194.59) by WTL-EXCHSV2-1.sandvine.com (192.168.194.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P521) id 15.1.1034.26; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 11:51:16 -0500
Received: from WTL-EXCHSV2-2.sandvine.com ([fe80::70e5:d09e:7bb9:986a]) by WTL-EXCHSV2-2.sandvine.com ([fe80::70e5:d09e:7bb9:986a%20]) with mapi id 15.01.1034.026; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 11:51:16 -0500
From: Kyle Larose <klarose@sandvine.com>
To: "captive-portals@ietf.org" <captive-portals@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Which portion of packet is used for capport enforcement?
Thread-Index: AQHTs9jJPVc8a+E/IkWoymTos701KA==
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 16:51:16 +0000
Message-ID: <92548449420341e8b9db51d96f392722@sandvine.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [70.51.158.182]
x-c2processedorg: b2f06e69-072f-40ee-90c5-80a34e700794
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_92548449420341e8b9db51d96f392722sandvinecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/wsvQ-Ny5p_wCWBI7BeTZ-lvYnsk>
Subject: [Captive-portals] Which portion of packet is used for capport enforcement?
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 16:51:19 -0000
Issue number 5 (https://github.com/capport-wg/architecture/issues/5) against the captive portal architecture raises the question of which portion of the packet to use for capport enforcement. I have uploaded a change to the architecture repo to attempt to address this issue: https://github.com/capport-wg/architecture/pull/9. Feel free to read over the pull request and give feedback. Thanks! Kyle Disclaimer: This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the intended recipient(s) only and may contain information that is considered confidential, proprietary, sensitive and/or otherwise legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication. Thank you for your cooperation.